Meloy J R, Singer J
University of California, San Diego.
J Pers Assess. 1991 Apr;56(2):202-17. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5602_2.
We analyzed the contemporary empirical and theoretical literature concerning the two predominant approaches for scoring formal thought disorder on the Rorschach, the Comprehensive System special scores, and the methodology of Rapaport, Gill, and Schafer (1946/1968). The psychoanalytic research related to selected special scores is reviewed, and some linkages to psychoanalytic developmental theory and psychopathology are made. Recommendations are presented to bridge the gap between these two important avenues of Rorschach research, with an emphasis on empirical rigor and intrapsychic contextual meaning.
我们分析了当代关于罗夏墨迹测验中两种主要的形式思维障碍评分方法的实证和理论文献,即综合系统特殊分数以及拉帕波特、吉尔和谢弗(1946/1968)的方法。回顾了与选定特殊分数相关的精神分析研究,并建立了与精神分析发展理论和精神病理学的一些联系。提出了弥合罗夏墨迹测验研究这两条重要途径之间差距的建议,重点是实证严谨性和心理内部情境意义。