Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
Cancer. 2010 Jul 1;116(13):3119-26. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25184.
Although nephrectomy cures most localized renal cancers, this oncologic benefit may be outweighed by the renal functional costs of such an approach. In this study, the authors examined overall survival in 537 patients who had localized renal tumors < or = 7 cm detected at age > or = 75 years to investigate whether surgical intervention improved survival compared with active surveillance.
Clinical T1 renal tumors were managed with surveillance (20%), nephron-sparing interventions (53%), or nephrectomy (27%). Cox regression models were constructed based on age, comorbidity, management type, renal function, and other variables.
The median follow-up was 3.9 years, and death from any cause occurred in 148 patients (28%). The most common cause of death was cardiovascular (29%), and cancer progression was responsible in only 4% of deaths. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed decreased overall survival for patients who underwent surveillance and nephrectomy relative to nephron-sparing intervention (P = .01); however, surveilled patients were older and had greater comorbidity. In multivariate analysis, significant predictors of overall survival included age (P = .0004) and comorbidity (P < .0001) but not management type (P = .3). Preoperative renal function (P = .006) and comorbidity (P = .005) were predictors of cardiovascular mortality, and nephrectomy was associated with greatest loss of renal function.
In patients aged > or =75 years, surgical management of clinically localized renal cortical tumors was not associated with increased survival. Patients died mostly of cardiovascular causes, similar to the general elderly population. Nephrectomy accelerated renal dysfunction, which was associated with cardiovascular mortality. Current paradigms suggest that there is over treatment of localized renal tumors, and further study will be required to evaluate the advisability of various options in patients with limited life expectancy.
虽然肾切除术可以治愈大多数局限性肾癌,但这种方法对肾功能的影响可能超过了肿瘤学方面的益处。在这项研究中,作者对 537 名年龄大于或等于 75 岁、检测出局限性肿瘤小于或等于 7cm 的肾肿瘤患者进行了总体生存分析,以调查手术干预是否比主动监测能提高生存率。
临床 T1 期肾肿瘤采用监测(20%)、保肾干预(53%)或肾切除术(27%)治疗。根据年龄、合并症、治疗方式、肾功能及其他变量构建 Cox 回归模型。
中位随访时间为 3.9 年,共有 148 例患者(28%)死于任何原因。最常见的死因是心血管疾病(29%),癌症进展导致的死亡仅占 4%。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,与保肾干预相比,监测和肾切除术患者的总体生存率降低(P =.01);然而,监测组患者年龄较大且合并症较多。多变量分析显示,影响总体生存率的显著因素包括年龄(P =.0004)和合并症(P <.0001),而治疗方式无影响(P =.3)。术前肾功能(P =.006)和合并症(P =.005)是心血管死亡的预测因素,肾切除术与肾功能丧失最显著相关。
对于年龄大于或等于 75 岁的患者,手术治疗局限性肾皮质肿瘤并不会提高生存率。患者主要死于心血管疾病,与普通老年人群相似。肾切除术加速肾功能衰竭,而后者与心血管死亡相关。目前的治疗模式提示局限性肾肿瘤的治疗过度,需要进一步研究评估各种治疗方案对预期寿命有限患者的适宜性。