Kaplan S A, Chancellor M B, Blaivas J G
Department of Urology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York.
J Urol. 1991 Jul;146(1):113-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37727-3.
To ascertain the relationship between the clinical neurological level, and bladder and sphincter behavior, the video-urodynamic studies of 489 patients with spinal cord lesions due to a variety of causes were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified based on the clinical neurological level, etiology of the lesion and presence or absence of signs of sacral cord involvement. Urodynamic findings were classified as either detrusor hyperreflexia, detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia, detrusor areflexia or normal. The results indicate that although there was a general correlation between the neurological level of injury and the expected vesicourethral function, it was neither absolute nor specific. For example, 20 of 117 cervical cord lesions had detrusor areflexia, 42 of 156 lumbar cord lesions had detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia and 26 of 84 sacral cord had either detrusor hyperreflexia or detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia. However, if one considers the presence of neurological abnormalities, 84% of the suprasacral cord lesions with detrusor areflexia have sacral cord signs. In contrast, all suprasacral cord lesions with no evidence of sacral cord involvement have either detrusor hyperreflexia or detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia. The positive predictive value for positive sacral cord signs and detrusor areflexia was 87%. The positive predictive value for negative sacral cord signs and detrusor hyperreflexia/detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia was 81%. These data suggest that the clinical neurological examination alone is not an adequate barometer to predict neurourological dysfunction and that video-urodynamic evaluation provides a more precise diagnosis for each patient.
为确定临床神经平面与膀胱及括约肌功能之间的关系,我们回顾性分析了489例因各种原因导致脊髓损伤患者的影像尿动力学研究结果。患者根据临床神经平面、损伤病因以及是否存在骶髓受累体征进行分类。尿动力学检查结果分为逼尿肌反射亢进、逼尿肌-外括约肌协同失调、逼尿肌无反射或正常。结果表明,尽管损伤的神经平面与预期的膀胱尿道功能之间存在一般相关性,但这种相关性既不绝对也不具有特异性。例如,117例颈髓损伤中有20例存在逼尿肌无反射,156例腰髓损伤中有42例存在逼尿肌-外括约肌协同失调,84例骶髓损伤中有26例存在逼尿肌反射亢进或逼尿肌-外括约肌协同失调。然而,如果考虑神经异常的存在,84%存在逼尿肌无反射的骶上脊髓损伤有骶髓体征。相反,所有无骶髓受累证据的骶上脊髓损伤均存在逼尿肌反射亢进或逼尿肌-外括约肌协同失调。骶髓体征阳性和逼尿肌无反射的阳性预测值为87%。骶髓体征阴性和逼尿肌反射亢进/逼尿肌-外括约肌协同失调的阳性预测值为81%。这些数据表明,仅靠临床神经学检查不足以预测神经泌尿功能障碍,而影像尿动力学评估可为每位患者提供更精确的诊断。