• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较雷帕霉素洗脱支架早期、晚期和极晚期支架血栓形成患者的基线人口统计学、临床表现和长期预后:来自支架血栓形成注册研究的观察结果,用于审查和再评估(RESTART)。

Comparisons of baseline demographics, clinical presentation, and long-term outcome among patients with early, late, and very late stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting stents: Observations from the Registry of Stent Thrombosis for Review and Reevaluation (RESTART).

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.

出版信息

Circulation. 2010 Jul 6;122(1):52-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.903955. Epub 2010 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.903955
PMID:20566955
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stent thrombosis (ST) after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation has not yet been adequately characterized, mainly because of its low incidence.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Registry of Stent Thrombosis for Review and Reevaluation (RESTART) is a Japanese nationwide registry of sirolimus-eluting stent-associated ST comprising 611 patients with definite ST (early [within 30 days; EST], 322 patients; late [between 31 and 365 days; LST], 105 patients; and very late [>1 year; VLST], 184 patients). Baseline demographics, clinical presentation, and long-term outcome of sirolimus-eluting stent-associated ST were compared among patients with EST, LST, and VLST. Baseline demographics were significantly different according to the timing of ST. Characteristic demographic factors for LST/VLST versus EST identified by multivariable model were hemodialysis, end-stage renal disease not on hemodialysis, absence of circumflex target, target of chronic total occlusion, prior percutaneous coronary intervention, and age <65 years. For LST versus VLST, they were hemodialysis, heart failure, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and low body mass index. Patients with LST had a significantly higher rate of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 2/3 flow (36%) at the time of ST than those with EST (13%) (P<0.0001) and VLST (17%; P<0.0001). Mortality rate at 1 year after ST was significantly lower in patients with VLST (10.5%) compared with those with EST (22.4%; P=0.003) or LST (23.5%; P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

ST timing-dependent differences in baseline demographic features, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade, and mortality rate suggest possible differences in the predominant pathophysiological mechanisms of ST according to timing after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.

摘要

背景

尽管西罗莫司洗脱支架置入后发生支架血栓(ST)的情况并不常见,但目前仍缺乏对其全面的认识。

方法和结果

支架血栓注册研究(RESTART)是一项日本全国范围内的西罗莫司洗脱支架相关 ST 注册研究,共纳入 611 例明确诊断为 ST 的患者(早期[30 天内;EST],322 例;晚期[31-365 天;LST],105 例;极晚期[>1 年;VLST],184 例)。比较 EST、LST 和 VLST 患者的基线人口统计学特征、临床表现和长期预后。ST 发生时间不同,患者的基线人口统计学特征也存在显著差异。多变量模型识别出 LST/VLST 与 EST 相比的特征性人口统计学因素为血液透析、非血液透析终末期肾病、无回旋支靶病变、慢性完全闭塞靶病变、既往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和年龄<65 岁。对于 LST 与 VLST 相比,这些因素为血液透析、心力衰竭、胰岛素依赖型糖尿病和低体重指数。发生 ST 时,LST 患者 TIMI 血流分级 2/3 级的比例(36%)显著高于 EST 患者(13%)(P<0.0001)和 VLST 患者(17%)(P<0.0001)。ST 后 1 年死亡率在 VLST 患者(10.5%)显著低于 EST 患者(22.4%)(P=0.003)和 LST 患者(23.5%)(P=0.009)。

结论

基于 ST 发生时间的不同,患者的基线人口统计学特征、TIMI 血流分级和死亡率存在差异,提示西罗莫司洗脱支架置入后 ST 可能存在不同的主要病理生理机制。

相似文献

1
Comparisons of baseline demographics, clinical presentation, and long-term outcome among patients with early, late, and very late stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting stents: Observations from the Registry of Stent Thrombosis for Review and Reevaluation (RESTART).比较雷帕霉素洗脱支架早期、晚期和极晚期支架血栓形成患者的基线人口统计学、临床表现和长期预后:来自支架血栓形成注册研究的观察结果,用于审查和再评估(RESTART)。
Circulation. 2010 Jul 6;122(1):52-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.903955. Epub 2010 Jun 21.
2
Very late stent thrombosis and late target lesion revascularization after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: five-year outcome of the j-Cypher Registry.西罗莫司洗脱支架置入术后非常晚期支架血栓形成和晚期靶病变血运重建:j-Cypher 注册研究的 5 年结果。
Circulation. 2012 Jan 31;125(4):584-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.046599. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
3
Mortality after presentation with stent thrombosis is associated with time from index percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the VA CART program.支架血栓形成后出现的死亡率与首次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的时间相关:来自退伍军人事务部CART项目的报告。
Am Heart J. 2014 Oct;168(4):560-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.07.020. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
4
Peri-stent contrast staining and very late stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: an observation from the RESTART (REgistry of Stent Thrombosis for review And Re-evaluaTion) angiographic substudy.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入术后支架周围造影剂染色与极晚期支架内血栓形成:来自RESTART(支架血栓形成回顾与重新评估注册研究)血管造影亚研究的观察结果
EuroIntervention. 2013 Nov;9(7):831-40. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I7A137.
5
Five-year clinical follow-up from the MISSION! Intervention Study: sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare metal stent implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, a randomised controlled trial.MISSION! 干预研究的 5 年临床随访:ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,西罗莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架置入的随机对照试验。
EuroIntervention. 2012 Jan;7(9):1021-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I9A164.
6
Late adverse events after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stent and bare-metal stent: long-term (5-7 years) follow-up of the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome study-Kyoto registry Cohort-2.西罗莫司洗脱支架和裸金属支架植入后的晚期不良事件:冠状动脉血运重建显示结局研究-京都注册队列-2 的长期(5-7 年)随访。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr;7(2):168-79. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000987. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
7
Persistent coronary no flow after wire insertion is an early and readily available mortality risk factor despite successful mechanical intervention in acute myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis from the STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) trials.尽管在急性心肌梗死中成功进行了机械干预,但导丝插入后持续无复流是一个早期且易于获得的死亡风险因素:来自 STRATEGY(单次大剂量替罗非班和西罗莫司洗脱支架与阿昔单抗和裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死)和 MULTISTRATEGY(多中心评估单次大剂量替罗非班与阿昔单抗与西罗莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死的研究)试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan;4(1):51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.016.
8
Prediction of 1-year clinical outcomes using the SYNTAX score in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a substudy of the STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) trials.应用 SYNTAX 评分预测行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者 1 年临床结局:STRATEGY(单次大剂量替罗非班和西罗莫司洗脱支架与阿昔单抗和裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死)和 MULTISTRATEGY(多中心评价单次大剂量替罗非班与阿昔单抗联合西罗莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死研究)试验的一项亚研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan;4(1):66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.017.
9
Comparison of long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention for stent thrombosis between early, late, and very late stent thrombosis.比较早期、晚期和极晚期支架血栓形成患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后支架血栓形成的长期预后。
Circ J. 2014;78(1):101-9. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-0780. Epub 2013 Nov 2.
10
Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: RACES-MI trial.随机比较依维莫司洗脱支架和西罗莫司洗脱支架在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:RACES-MI 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):849-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Stent thrombosis in acute myocardial infarction in the era of second-generation drug-eluting stent: incidence, prognosis, and historical comparisons with previous stent era.第二代药物洗脱支架时代急性心肌梗死中的支架血栓形成:发生率、预后及与既往支架时代的历史比较
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1007/s12928-025-01186-7.
2
Long-term prognosis after acute coronary syndrome due to de novo coronary artery lesions and stent thrombosis in patients on hemodialysis.血液透析患者新发冠状动脉病变及支架血栓形成所致急性冠状动脉综合征后的长期预后
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 18;15(1):26063. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11968-x.
3
Genetic Backgrounds Associated With Stent Thrombosis: A Pilot Study From a Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry.
与支架血栓形成相关的遗传背景:一项来自经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究的初步研究
JACC Adv. 2023 Jan 27;2(1):100172. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100172. eCollection 2023 Jan.
4
Intravascular Imaging versus Physiological Assessment versus Biomechanics-Which Is a Better Guide for Coronary Revascularization.血管内成像与生理评估与生物力学——哪种对冠状动脉血运重建是更好的指导?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 19;13(12):2117. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13122117.
5
The Role of Oxidants in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Induced Endothelial Dysfunction: Can We Harness Redox Signaling to Improve Clinical Outcomes?氧化剂在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗引起的血管内皮功能障碍中的作用:我们能否利用氧化还原信号来改善临床结局?
Antioxid Redox Signal. 2023 May;38(13-15):1022-1040. doi: 10.1089/ars.2022.0204. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
6
Usefulness of a Perfusion Balloon for Intraprocedural Stent Thrombosis in a Patient With ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术中球囊预扩张在合并心源性休克的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者支架内血栓形成中的应用。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2022 Nov 1;49(6). doi: 10.14503/THIJ-21-7555.
7
Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Pathophysiology and Translational Perspectives.2019冠状病毒病感染患者的急性冠状动脉综合征:病理生理学与转化医学视角
Transl Med UniSa. 2022 Aug 29;24(2):1-11. doi: 10.37825/2239-9754.1034. eCollection 2022.
8
The outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stent thrombosis.支架内血栓形成患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结局。
Indian Heart J. 2022 Nov-Dec;74(6):464-468. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2022.11.003. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
9
Intravascular Imaging for Guiding In-Stent Restenosis and Stent Thrombosis Therapy.血管内影像学在指导支架内再狭窄和支架内血栓形成治疗中的应用。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Nov 15;11(22):e026492. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026492. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
10
Uremic Toxins and Cardiovascular Risk in Chronic Kidney Disease: What Have We Learned Recently beyond the Past Findings?尿毒症毒素与慢性肾脏病心血管风险:除了过去的发现,我们最近又有了哪些新的认识?
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Apr 14;14(4):280. doi: 10.3390/toxins14040280.