Suppr超能文献

高级别子宫内膜癌:浆液性和 3 级子宫内膜样癌具有不同的免疫表型和结局。

High-grade endometrial carcinoma: serous and grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas have different immunophenotypes and outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, King Fahad National Guard Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010 Jul;29(4):343-50. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e3181cd6552.

Abstract

High-grade endometrial carcinomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors and include grade 3 endometrioid (EC-3), serous (SC), and clear cell carcinomas (CCC). There are conflicting data about the prognosis of these subtypes of high-grade endometrial carcinoma; this may be a result of lack of reproducibility in classifying tumor cell type. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in immunophenotype and outcome in a series of high-grade endometrial carcinomas, focusing on the comparison of EC-3 versus SC. We selected 180 endometrial carcinomas of SC, EC, or CCC type. No mixed carcinomas were included in the study. We chose the following immunohistochemical markers, estrogen receptor (ER), insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3), p16, p53, progesterone receptor (PR), and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) as being significantly differentially expressed in endometrial carcinoma subtypes. The tumors were stratified into 4 groups on the basis of their cell type and grade: EC grade 1 or 2, EC-3, SC, and CCC. Univariate survival analysis revealed significant differences in outcome between the 4 groups (P<0.0001), with significantly longer disease-specific survival for grade 1 or 2 EC versus EC-3 (P=0.0001), and EC-3 versus SC (P=0.0003). p16, PTEN, and IMP3 expression was observed more frequently in SC compared with EC-3 (P<0.0001, P=0.021, and P=0.031, respectively). These 3 markers showed the highest sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between EC-3 and SC, with receiver operating characteristics area under the curve of 0.85, 0.69, and 0.71, respectively. ER and p53 approached but did not reach significance for differential expression in EC-3 versus SC (P=0.055 and P=0.068, respectively). A combination of p16 and PTEN predicts EC-3 versus SC with a sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 96.8%. p16 and PTEN can aid in distinguishing between EC-3 and SC of the endometrium, and are superior to ER, PR, and p53 for this purpose. EC-3 carcinomas have a significantly better prognosis than SC carcinomas of the endometrium.

摘要

高级别子宫内膜癌是一组异质性肿瘤,包括 3 级子宫内膜样癌(EC-3)、浆液性癌(SC)和透明细胞癌(CCC)。这些高级别子宫内膜癌亚型的预后存在相互矛盾的数据;这可能是由于肿瘤细胞类型分类缺乏可重复性所致。本研究的目的是检查一系列高级别子宫内膜癌中免疫表型和结局的差异,重点比较 EC-3 与 SC。我们选择了 180 例 SC、EC 或 CCC 型子宫内膜癌。本研究未纳入混合性癌。我们选择了以下免疫组化标志物:雌激素受体(ER)、胰岛素样生长因子 2 mRNA 结合蛋白 3(IMP3)、p16、p53、孕激素受体(PR)和磷酸酶和张力蛋白同源物(PTEN),这些标志物在子宫内膜癌亚型中表达显著不同。根据细胞类型和分级,将肿瘤分为 4 组:EC 分级 1 或 2、EC-3、SC 和 CCC。单因素生存分析显示,4 组之间的生存结果存在显著差异(P<0.0001),EC 分级 1 或 2 与 EC-3(P=0.0001)以及 EC-3 与 SC(P=0.0003)相比,疾病特异性生存率显著更长。与 EC-3 相比,SC 中观察到 p16、PTEN 和 IMP3 的表达更为频繁(P<0.0001、P=0.021 和 P=0.031)。这 3 种标志物在区分 EC-3 和 SC 方面具有最高的敏感性和特异性,ROC 曲线下面积分别为 0.85、0.69 和 0.71。ER 和 p53 在 EC-3 与 SC 之间的差异表达接近但未达到显著水平(P=0.055 和 P=0.068)。p16 和 PTEN 的组合预测 EC-3 与 SC 的敏感性为 90.0%,特异性为 96.8%。p16 和 PTEN 可辅助区分子宫内膜的 EC-3 和 SC,在这方面优于 ER、PR 和 p53。EC-3 癌的预后明显优于子宫内膜的 SC 癌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验