• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在存在定性相互作用的情况下,将环境数据纳入基因-疾病关联研究的效果。

Effect of including environmental data in investigations of gene-disease associations in the presence of qualitative interactions.

机构信息

Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Genet Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;34(6):552-60. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20511.

DOI:10.1002/gepi.20511
PMID:20568284
Abstract

Complex diseases are likely to be caused by the interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Despite this, gene-disease associations are frequently investigated using models that focus solely on a marginal gene effect, ignoring environmental factors entirely. Failing to take into account a gene-environment interaction can weaken the apparent gene-disease association, leading to loss in statistical power and, potentially, inability to identify genuine risk factors. If a gene-environment interaction exists, therefore, a joint analysis allowing the effect of the gene to differ between groups defined by the environmental exposure can have greater statistical power than a marginal gene-disease model. However, environmental data are subject to measurement error. Substantial losses in statistical power for detecting gene-environment interactions can arise from measurement error in the environmental exposure. It is unclear, however, what effect measurement error may have on the power of the joint analysis. We consider the potential benefits, in terms of statistical power, of collecting concurrent environmental data within large cohorts in order to enhance gene detection. We further consider whether these benefits remain in the presence of misclassification in both the gene and the environmental exposure. We find that when an effect of the gene is apparent only in the presence of the environmental exposure, the joint analysis has greater power than a marginal gene-disease analysis. This comparative increase in power remains in the presence of likely levels of misclassification of either the gene or environmental exposure.

摘要

复杂疾病很可能是由遗传和环境因素相互作用引起的。尽管如此,基因-疾病关联通常使用仅关注边际基因效应的模型进行研究,完全忽略环境因素。如果不考虑基因-环境相互作用,可能会削弱明显的基因-疾病关联,导致统计效力下降,并且可能无法识别真正的风险因素。因此,如果存在基因-环境相互作用,允许基因在环境暴露定义的组之间产生不同影响的联合分析比边际基因-疾病模型具有更大的统计效力。然而,环境数据可能存在测量误差。环境暴露的测量误差会导致检测基因-环境相互作用的统计效力大大降低。然而,目前尚不清楚测量误差可能对联合分析的效力有何影响。我们考虑了在大型队列中收集并发环境数据以增强基因检测的潜在益处,即统计效力方面。我们进一步考虑在基因和环境暴露都存在分类错误的情况下,这些益处是否仍然存在。我们发现,当基因的作用仅在环境暴露存在时才明显时,联合分析比边际基因-疾病分析具有更大的效力。这种比较增加的效力在基因或环境暴露的分类错误达到可能的水平时仍然存在。

相似文献

1
Effect of including environmental data in investigations of gene-disease associations in the presence of qualitative interactions.在存在定性相互作用的情况下,将环境数据纳入基因-疾病关联研究的效果。
Genet Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;34(6):552-60. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20511.
2
The effects of misclassification in studies of gene-environment interactions.基因-环境相互作用研究中错误分类的影响。
Hum Hered. 2009;67(2):77-87. doi: 10.1159/000179556. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
3
Gene-environment studies: any advantage over environmental studies?基因-环境研究:相较于环境研究有何优势?
Carcinogenesis. 2007 Jul;28(7):1526-32. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgm068. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
4
Tests for gene-environment interaction from case-control data: a novel study of type I error, power and designs.基于病例对照数据的基因-环境相互作用检验:关于I型错误、效能和设计的一项新研究
Genet Epidemiol. 2008 Nov;32(7):615-26. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20337.
5
Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene-gene interactions in the presence of genotyping error, missing data, phenocopy, and genetic heterogeneity.在存在基因分型错误、数据缺失、表型模拟和遗传异质性的情况下,多因素降维法检测基因-基因相互作用的效能。
Genet Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;24(2):150-7. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10218.
6
Does accounting for gene-environment (GxE) interaction increase the power to detect the effect of a gene in a multifactorial disease?考虑基因-环境(GxE)相互作用是否会增加在多因素疾病中检测基因效应的效能?
Genet Epidemiol. 2003 Apr;24(3):200-7. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10221.
7
Exploiting gene-environment interaction to detect genetic associations.利用基因-环境相互作用来检测基因关联。
Hum Hered. 2007;63(2):111-9. doi: 10.1159/000099183. Epub 2007 Feb 2.
8
Genetic association and gene-environment interaction: a new method for overcoming the lack of exposure information in controls.遗传关联与基因-环境交互作用:一种克服对照中缺乏暴露信息的新方法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Jan 15;173(2):225-35. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq352. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
9
A strategy to discover genes that carry multi-allelic or mono-allelic risk for common diseases: a cohort allelic sums test (CAST).一种发现携带常见疾病多等位基因或单等位基因风险的基因的策略:队列等位基因总和检验(CAST)。
Mutat Res. 2007 Feb 3;615(1-2):28-56. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
10
Estimation of magnitude in gene-environment interactions in the presence of measurement error.存在测量误差时基因-环境相互作用中效应大小的估计。
Stat Med. 2004 Mar 30;23(6):987-98. doi: 10.1002/sim.1662.

引用本文的文献

1
The missing heritability in type 1 diabetes.1 型糖尿病的遗传缺失。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Oct;24(10):1901-1911. doi: 10.1111/dom.14777. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
2
The Promise of Selecting Individuals from the Extremes of Exposure in the Analysis of Gene-Physical Activity Interactions.在基因与身体活动相互作用分析中从暴露极端值中选择个体的前景。
Hum Hered. 2018;83(6):315-332. doi: 10.1159/000499711. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
3
Childhood adiposity, adult adiposity, and the ACE gene insertion/deletion polymorphism: evidence of gene-environment interaction effects on adult blood pressure and hypertension status in adulthood.
儿童肥胖、成人肥胖与 ACE 基因插入/缺失多态性:基因-环境相互作用对成人血压和成年期高血压状况的影响证据。
J Hypertens. 2018 Nov;36(11):2168-2176. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001816.
4
The importance of gene-environment interactions in human obesity.基因-环境相互作用在人类肥胖中的重要性。
Clin Sci (Lond). 2016 Sep 1;130(18):1571-97. doi: 10.1042/CS20160221.
5
New directions in childhood obesity research: how a comprehensive biorepository will allow better prediction of outcomes.儿童肥胖研究的新方向:综合生物库如何实现更好的结果预测。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Oct 22;10:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-100.