• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

椎动脉起源支架再探讨:紫杉醇洗脱支架改善结果。

Vertebral artery origin stents revisited: improved results with paclitaxel-eluting stents.

机构信息

University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2010 Jul;67(1):41-8; discussion 48. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000370010.09419.23.

DOI:10.1227/01.neu.0000370010.09419.23
PMID:20568666
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vertebral origin angioplasty and stenting (VOAS) with bare metal stents is associated with a high rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR).

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the rate of ISR after VOAS with drug-eluting stents.

METHODS

Twenty patients (15 men, 5 women; age range, 36-88 years; mean, 63.7 years) were treated for VOAS with a paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus Express2, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts). Stenosis at follow-up was quantified as insignificant (0%-24%), mild (25%-49%), moderate (50%-74%), and severe (75%-100%). ISR was defined using a binary criteria of >50% stenosis at follow-up angiography.

RESULTS

All procedures were technically successful with no periprocedural complications. Follow-up angiography (range, 4-48 months; mean, 14.7 months) showed insignificant stenosis in 9 patients, mild in 6, moderate in 4, and severe in 1. In 1 patient with "moderate" stenosis, the stent migrated distally; therefore, the lesion restenosis was not within the stent. Thus, 4 of 19 patients (21%) exhibited binary moderate or severe ISR, and 5 of 20 showed restenosis at the lesion (25%). The patient with severe stenosis developed stent thrombosis>3 years after VOAS.

CONCLUSION

VOAS with drug-eluting stents was associated with a low incidence of periprocedural complications. Although the rate of restenosis was half that seen with the use of bare metallic stents, 21% of patients still developed moderate or severe ISR. These patients may require>or=1 revascularization procedures. The risk of delayed stent thrombosis may necessitate lifelong dual antiplatelet medications.

摘要

背景

经皮椎体成形术和血管成形术联合使用裸金属支架与支架内再狭窄(ISR)的发生率较高相关。

目的

我们评估了经皮椎体成形术和血管成形术联合使用药物洗脱支架后的 ISR 发生率。

方法

20 名患者(15 名男性,5 名女性;年龄 36-88 岁;平均年龄 63.7 岁)接受了紫杉醇洗脱支架(Taxus Express2,波士顿科学,马萨诸塞州纳提克)的经皮椎体成形术和血管成形术治疗。随访时狭窄程度被量化为无狭窄(0%-24%)、轻度狭窄(25%-49%)、中度狭窄(50%-74%)和重度狭窄(75%-100%)。ISR 定义为随访血管造影显示>50%的狭窄。

结果

所有手术均成功完成,无围手术期并发症。随访血管造影(范围 4-48 个月;平均 14.7 个月)显示 9 例无狭窄,6 例轻度狭窄,4 例中度狭窄,1 例重度狭窄。在 1 例“中度”狭窄的患者中,支架向远端迁移;因此,病变再狭窄不在支架内。因此,19 例患者中有 4 例(21%)出现中度或重度 ISR,20 例中有 5 例(25%)出现病变再狭窄。有严重狭窄的患者在经皮椎体成形术和血管成形术后>3 年发生支架内血栓形成。

结论

经皮椎体成形术和血管成形术联合使用药物洗脱支架与围手术期并发症发生率低相关。尽管再狭窄率是使用裸金属支架的一半,但仍有 21%的患者出现中度或重度 ISR。这些患者可能需要>或=1 次血运重建手术。支架内血栓形成的延迟风险可能需要终身服用双联抗血小板药物。

相似文献

1
Vertebral artery origin stents revisited: improved results with paclitaxel-eluting stents.椎动脉起源支架再探讨:紫杉醇洗脱支架改善结果。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Jul;67(1):41-8; discussion 48. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000370010.09419.23.
2
Arterial occlusions increase the risk of in-stent restenosis after vertebral artery ostium stenting.动脉闭塞增加椎动脉开口支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的风险。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Jun;11(6):574-578. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014243. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
Impact of post-intervention minimal stent area on 9-month follow-up patency of paclitaxel-eluting stents: an integrated intravascular ultrasound analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI and TAXUS ATLAS Workhorse, Long Lesion, and Direct Stent Trials.紫杉醇洗脱支架置入术后最小支架面积对 9 个月随访通畅率的影响:来自 TAXUS IV、V、VI 及 TAXUS ATLAS Workhorse、长病变、直接支架试验的血管内超声综合分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(12):1269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.005.
4
Late Restenosis After Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Occurs in Patients With Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis.紫杉醇涂层球囊血管成形术后晚期再狭窄发生于药物洗脱支架再狭窄患者中。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jul 7;66(1):14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.002.
5
One-year results of the CRISTAL Trial, a randomized comparison of cypher sirolimus-eluting coronary stents versus balloon angioplasty for restenosis of drug-eluting stents.CRISTAL 试验的一年结果,对药物洗脱支架再狭窄的西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉雷帕霉素洗脱支架与球囊血管成形术的随机比较。
J Interv Cardiol. 2012 Dec;25(6):586-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2012.00769.x. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
6
A randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent in patients with bare-metal stent-in-stent restenosis: the RIBS V Clinical Trial (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs. everolimus-eluting stent).药物洗脱球囊与依维莫司洗脱支架治疗金属裸支架内再狭窄的随机对照研究:RIBS V 临床试验(金属裸支架内再狭窄:紫杉醇洗脱球囊与依维莫司洗脱支架)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 15;63(14):1378-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
7
A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of paclitaxel-coated balloon versus paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis: results from the PEPCAD China ISR trial.紫杉醇涂层球囊与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗药物洗脱支架内再狭窄的前瞻性、多中心、随机试验:来自 PEPCAD China ISR 试验的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(2):204-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.011.
8
Paclitaxel-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the TAXUS V ISR randomized trial.紫杉醇洗脱支架与血管内近距离放射治疗用于裸金属支架内支架再狭窄的比较:TAXUS V ISR随机试验
JAMA. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1253-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1253. Epub 2006 Mar 12.
9
Clinical outcomes and influencing factors of in-stent restenosis after stenting for symptomatic stenosis of the vertebral V1 segment.症状性椎动脉V1段狭窄支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的临床结局及影响因素
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Nov;68(5):1406-1413. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.02.042. Epub 2018 May 19.
10
Restenosis rates following vertebral artery origin stenting: does stent type make a difference?椎动脉起始部支架置入术后的再狭窄率:支架类型有影响吗?
J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Mar;22(3):119-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Rapamycin-Eluting Vertebral Stents in Patients With Symptomatic Extracranial Vertebral Artery Stenosis.雷帕霉素洗脱椎动脉支架在有症状的颅外椎动脉狭窄患者中的安全性和有效性
Front Neurol. 2021 Nov 26;12:649426. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.649426. eCollection 2021.
2
Validation and comparison of drug eluting stent to bare metal stent for restenosis rates following vertebral artery ostium stenting: A single-center real-world study.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗椎动脉开口支架置入术后再狭窄率的验证及比较:一项单中心真实世界研究。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Oct;26(5):629-636. doi: 10.1177/1591019920949371. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
3
Endovascular treatment of the vertebral artery origin stenosis by using the closed-cell, self-expandable Carotid Wallstent.
采用密孔、自膨式颈动脉 Wallstent 治疗椎动脉起始部狭窄的血管内治疗。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Dec;26(6):805-813. doi: 10.1177/1591019920935276. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
4
Treatment of vertebral artery origin stenosis with a Pharos stent device: a single center experience.使用Pharos支架装置治疗椎动脉起始部狭窄:单中心经验
Interv Neuroradiol. 2011 Sep;17(3):316-22. doi: 10.1177/159101991101700306. Epub 2011 Oct 17.