• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗事故索赔与因疏忽导致的不良事件之间的关系。哈佛医疗实践研究III的结果。

Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III.

作者信息

Localio A R, Lawthers A G, Brennan T A, Laird N M, Hebert L E, Peterson L M, Newhouse J P, Weiler P C, Hiatt H H

机构信息

Center for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey 17033.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1991 Jul 25;325(4):245-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199107253250405.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM199107253250405
PMID:2057025
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

By matching the medical records of a random sample of 31,429 patients hospitalized in New York State in 1984 with statewide data on medical-malpractice claims, we identified patients who had filed claims against physicians and hospitals. These results were then compared with our findings, based on a review of the same medical records, regarding the incidence of injuries to patients caused by medical management (adverse events).

RESULTS

We identified 47 malpractice claims among 30,195 patients' records located on our initial visits to the hospitals, and 4 claims among 580 additional records located during follow-up visits. The overall rate of claims per discharge (weighted) was 0.13 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.076 to 0.18 percent). Of the 280 patients who had adverse events caused by medical negligence as defined by the study protocol, 8 filed malpractice claims (weighted rate, 1.53 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 0 to 3.2 percent). By contrast, our estimate of the statewide ratio of adverse events caused by negligence (27,179) to malpractice claims (3570) is 7.6 to 1. This relative frequency overstates the chances that a negligent adverse event will produce a claim, however, because most of the events for which claims were made in the sample did not meet our definition of adverse events due to negligence.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical-malpractice litigation infrequently compensates patients injured by medical negligence and rarely identifies, and holds providers accountable for, substandard care.

摘要

背景与方法

通过将1984年在纽约州住院的31429名患者的随机样本病历与全州医疗事故索赔数据进行匹配,我们确定了对医生和医院提出索赔的患者。然后,基于对相同病历的审查,将这些结果与我们关于医疗管理导致患者受伤(不良事件)发生率的研究结果进行比较。

结果

在我们首次走访医院时查阅的30195份患者病历中,我们确定了47起医疗事故索赔,在后续走访中查阅的另外580份病历中有4起索赔。每次出院的总体索赔率(加权)为0.13%(95%置信区间为0.076%至0.18%)。在按照研究方案定义的由医疗过失导致不良事件的280名患者中,有8人提出了医疗事故索赔(加权率为1.53%;95%置信区间为0至3.2%)。相比之下,我们估计全州因过失导致的不良事件(27179起)与医疗事故索赔(3570起)的比例为7.6比1。然而,这种相对频率夸大了过失性不良事件导致索赔的可能性,因为样本中提出索赔的大多数事件不符合我们对因过失导致的不良事件的定义。

结论

医疗事故诉讼很少对因医疗过失受伤的患者进行赔偿,而且很少识别出不合格护理并让提供者对此负责。

相似文献

1
Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III.医疗事故索赔与因疏忽导致的不良事件之间的关系。哈佛医疗实践研究III的结果。
N Engl J Med. 1991 Jul 25;325(4):245-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199107253250405.
2
The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II.住院患者不良事件的性质。哈佛医疗实践研究II的结果。
N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 7;324(6):377-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102073240605.
3
Relation between negligent adverse events and the outcomes of medical-malpractice litigation.医疗过失不良事件与医疗事故诉讼结果之间的关系。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Dec 26;335(26):1963-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199612263352606.
4
Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I.住院患者不良事件和过失的发生率。哈佛医疗实践研究I的结果。
N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 7;324(6):370-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102073240604.
5
Malpractice claims analysis yields widely applicable principles.医疗事故索赔分析产生了广泛适用的原则。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2003 Mar-Apr;24(2):109-17. doi: 10.1007/s00246-002-0264-7. Epub 2002 Sep 25.
6
Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough.手术不良事件、风险管理与医疗事故结果:发病率和死亡率审查是不够的。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072267.19263.26.
7
Urological medical malpractice.泌尿外科医疗事故
J Urol. 2001 May;165(5):1638-42.
8
Medico-legal autopsies as a source of information to improve patient safety.法医解剖作为获取信息以提高患者安全的一个来源。
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2009 Apr;11 Suppl 1:S76-9. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.01.108. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
9
Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. 1991.住院患者不良事件及过失发生率:哈佛医疗实践研究I的结果。1991年
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Apr;13(2):145-51; discussion 151-2. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2002.003822.
10
Negligent care and malpractice claiming behavior in Utah and Colorado.犹他州和科罗拉多州的医疗过失护理与医疗事故索赔行为。
Med Care. 2000 Mar;38(3):250-60. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200003000-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
The Analysis of Medical Malpractice Litigation Related to Diagnosis of Headache in Japan: Mitigating Medicolegal Risks for Primary Care Physicians.日本与头痛诊断相关的医疗事故诉讼分析:降低基层医疗医生的法医学风险
Cureus. 2025 Aug 10;17(8):e89763. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89763. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Medical Malpractice.医疗事故
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2025 Oct 1;63(4):1-6. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000495. Epub 2025 Aug 14.
3
Assessment of the occurrence of adverse events through the global trigger tool in a university hospital in Italy.
通过全球触发工具对意大利一家大学医院不良事件的发生情况进行评估。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 4;15(1):23973. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08617-8.
4
Development of a trigger tool to identify harmful incidents, no harm incidents, and near misses in prehospital emergency care.开发一种触发工具,以识别院前急救中有害事件、无伤害事件和接近伤害事件。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 29;32(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01209-x.
5
Current Irish medicolegal landscape: an unsustainable trajectory.当前爱尔兰的医学法律环境:不可持续的发展轨迹。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Aug;12(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002433. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
6
Comparison of Quality Measures From US Hospitals With Physician vs Nonphysician Chief Executive Officers.美国医院的质量指标比较:有医师还是非医师首席执行官。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2236621. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36621.
7
Litigation in the management of urinary stone disease.尿路结石病的治疗中的诉讼问题。
BJU Int. 2022 Oct;130(4):507-513. doi: 10.1111/bju.15750. Epub 2022 May 1.
8
Barriers to the Use of Clinical Decision Support for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism: Qualitative Interview Study.临床决策支持在肺栓塞评估中的应用障碍:定性访谈研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Aug 4;8(3):e25046. doi: 10.2196/25046.
9
State medical malpractice laws and utilization of surgical treatment for rotator cuff tear and proximal humerus fracture: an observational cohort study.州级医疗事故法与肩袖撕裂和肱骨近端骨折的外科治疗应用:一项观察性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 28;21(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06544-8.
10
Emergency Department and Urgent Care Medical Malpractice Claims 2001-15.2001-2015 年急诊科和紧急护理医疗事故索赔
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Feb 15;22(2):333-338. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.9.48845.