Piwkumsribonruang Narongchai, Somboonporn Woraruk, Luanratanakorn Patanaree, Kaewrudee Srinaree, Tharnprisan Piangjit, Soontrapa Sugree
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Jun;93(6):647-52.
The efficacy of hormone therapy (HT) on dry eye syndrome remains debatable.
To study the efficacy of HT on dry eye syndrome.
A randomized controlled, double blind, parallel group, community-based study in 42 post-menopausal patients was conducted. The patients had dry eye syndrome and were not taking any medications. They were assigned to one of two groups. Group A comprised 21 patients given transdermal 17 beta-estradiol (50 mg/day) and medroxy progesterone acetate (2.5 mg/day) continuously for three months and group B comprised 21 patients given both transdermal and oral placebo. Participants in the study were included for final analysis. The improvement of dry eye symptoms were measured by visual analog scale, tear secretion, intraocular pressure, corneal thickness, and tear breakup time determined before treatment and at 6 and 12 weeks of treatment.
At 12 weeks, the number of patients who reported improvement of dry eye symptoms was greater in the HT group than that in the placebo group. However, the difference was not statistically significant (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.04-2.80 and 0.60, 95% CI 0.33-2.03 in right and left eye, respectively). For other parameters, there was no significant difference between the two groups.
According to the present study, there is no strong evidence to support the use of HT for treating dry eye syndrome. The limited number of participants included in the present study may have contributed to the insignificant effects.
激素疗法(HT)对干眼症的疗效仍存在争议。
研究激素疗法对干眼症的疗效。
对42名绝经后患者进行了一项基于社区的随机对照、双盲、平行组研究。这些患者患有干眼症且未服用任何药物。他们被分为两组。A组由21名患者组成,连续三个月每天给予经皮17β-雌二醇(50毫克/天)和醋酸甲羟孕酮(2.5毫克/天);B组由21名患者组成,给予经皮和口服安慰剂。研究中的参与者纳入最终分析。通过视觉模拟量表、泪液分泌、眼压、角膜厚度以及治疗前、治疗6周和12周时测定的泪膜破裂时间来衡量干眼症症状的改善情况。
在12周时,激素疗法组报告干眼症症状改善的患者数量多于安慰剂组。然而,差异无统计学意义(右眼和左眼的相对危险度分别为0.25,95%可信区间为0.04 - 2.80;0.60,95%可信区间为0.33 - 2.03)。对于其他参数,两组之间无显著差异。
根据本研究,没有有力证据支持使用激素疗法治疗干眼症。本研究纳入的参与者数量有限可能导致了效果不显著。