Koh Kyoung Hwan, Seo Sung Wook, Kim Kyung Mu, Shim Jong Sup
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul, Korea.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2010 Jul-Aug;30(5):425-9. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181df1578.
The treatment goal in lateral condylar fracture is union without residual deformity. However, growth disturbance may occur despite initial anatomic reduction and secure fixation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional results, including complications, of lateral condylar fracture treatments in children, and to identify differences between treatment methods.
One hundred seventy-five patients followed for more than a year with available initial and final follow-up radiographs were included. Carrying angle and range of motion limitations were assessed, and functional results were evaluated using the scoring system devised by Dhillon et al. All complications including varus, valgus, lateral overgrowth, fishtail deformity, nonunion, malunion, and avascular necrosis were investigated statistically.
There were 113 male and 62 female of mean age 4 years 9 months. Thirty-nine patients were managed by cast immobilization. Closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) was carried out in 33 and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in 103. Kirschner wires were removed at a mean 5.5 weeks. There were 11 superficial infections, 3 valgus, 3 delayed unions. In 135 (77.1%) of the 175 patients, obvious lateral condylar overgrowths were observed at 19.8 (+/-16.8) months (range, 12 to 120) without evidence of a functional abnormality. Development of lateral elbow prominence revealed difference between the 3 treatment methods and it was caused by the difference between cast and ORIF (1 vs. 32, P<0.001). It also showed difference between the 3 fracture types and it was caused by significant difference between type I and II (1 vs. 24) and between I and III (1 vs. 14) (P<0.001, respectively). Mean radiographic carrying angles showed a decrease of 5.0 (+/-4.6) degrees at final follow-ups, but no significant difference was observed between fracture types or treatment method (P=0.832 and 0.850, respectively). Clinically, 17 cases (9.7%) with varus deformities were observed, although there was no need for corrective surgery. At final follow-ups, 116 patients had achieved an excellent result and 59 a good result.
This study shows that bone union and good clinical results can be achieved in children with a lateral condylar fracture, and that lateral overgrowth and cubitus varus are the most common residual deformities. Furthermore, these residual deformities were not remodeled at a mean 19.8 months after injury.
Case series, Level IV.
外侧髁骨折的治疗目标是实现愈合且无残留畸形。然而,尽管最初进行了解剖复位和牢固固定,仍可能发生生长紊乱。本研究的目的是评估儿童外侧髁骨折治疗的临床和功能结果,包括并发症,并确定治疗方法之间的差异。
纳入175例随访超过一年且有初始和最终随访X线片的患者。评估携带角和活动范围受限情况,并使用Dhillon等人设计的评分系统评估功能结果。对所有并发症,包括内翻、外翻、外侧过度生长、鱼尾状畸形、骨不连、畸形愈合和缺血性坏死进行统计学研究。
男性113例,女性62例,平均年龄4岁9个月。39例患者采用石膏固定治疗。33例行闭合复位内固定(CRIF),103例行切开复位内固定(ORIF)。克氏针平均在5.5周时取出。有11例表浅感染、3例外翻、3例延迟愈合。175例患者中有135例(77.1%)在19.8(±16.8)个月(范围12至120个月)时出现明显的外侧髁过度生长,且无功能异常迹象。外侧肘部突出的发生在3种治疗方法之间存在差异,是由石膏固定和ORIF之间的差异所致(1例对比32例,P<0.001)。在3种骨折类型之间也存在差异,是由I型和II型之间(1例对比24例)以及I型和III型之间(1例对比14例)的显著差异所致(P分别<0.001)。最终随访时平均X线携带角减小了5.0(±4.6)度,但在骨折类型或治疗方法之间未观察到显著差异(P分别为0.832和0.850)。临床上,观察到17例(9.7%)内翻畸形患者,不过无需进行矫正手术。在最终随访时,116例患者结果为优,59例为良。
本研究表明,儿童外侧髁骨折可实现骨愈合和良好的临床结果,外侧过度生长和肘内翻是最常见的残留畸形。此外,这些残留畸形在受伤后平均19.8个月时未得到重塑。
病例系列,IV级。