• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吗啡对记忆的影响:与纳洛酮、普萘洛尔和氟哌啶醇的相互作用。

Effects of morphine on memory: interactions with naloxone, propranolol and haloperidol.

作者信息

Saha N, Datta H, Sharma P L

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Pharmacology. 1991;42(1):10-4. doi: 10.1159/000138762.

DOI:10.1159/000138762
PMID:2057517
Abstract

The effects of morphine on memory have been shown to be dependent on the strain of animal used and on the experimental parameters. Memory was assessed in a passive avoidance task using Swiss albino (ICRC) mice. Morphine at doses of 1, 3 and 10 mg kg-1 was administered immediately after foot shock (memory retention) or 23.5 h after foot shock (memory retrieval). Retest step-down latencies measured 24 h later showed that morphine did not affect memory retention but dose-dependently impaired retrieval of memory. Administration of naloxone 0.1 mg kg-1 antagonised the effects of morphine and impaired memory retention. Propranolol 0.3 mg kg-1 along with morphine 3 mg kg-1 impaired memory retention only while haloperidol 0.1 mg kg-1 improved the impairment of memory retrieval caused by morphine 3 mg kg-1. Glucose did not alter the effects of morphine on memory. There was no per se effect of morphine, naloxone, propranolol, glucose and haloperidol on memory at the doses used. The effect of morphine on memory retention is mediated by opioid mechanisms; however, adrenergic and dopaminergic mechanisms possibly modulate retention and retrieval of memory, respectively.

摘要

吗啡对记忆的影响已被证明取决于所用动物的品系和实验参数。使用瑞士白化(ICRC)小鼠通过被动回避任务评估记忆。在足部电击后立即(记忆保持)或足部电击后23.5小时(记忆提取)给予剂量为1、3和10 mg kg-1的吗啡。24小时后测量的再测试步下潜伏期表明,吗啡不影响记忆保持,但剂量依赖性地损害记忆提取。给予0.1 mg kg-1的纳洛酮可拮抗吗啡的作用并损害记忆保持。0.3 mg kg-1的普萘洛尔与3 mg kg-1的吗啡一起仅损害记忆保持,而0.1 mg kg-1的氟哌啶醇可改善3 mg kg-1吗啡引起的记忆提取损害。葡萄糖不会改变吗啡对记忆的影响。在所使用的剂量下,吗啡、纳洛酮、普萘洛尔、葡萄糖和氟哌啶醇本身对记忆没有影响。吗啡对记忆保持的影响由阿片类机制介导;然而,肾上腺素能和多巴胺能机制可能分别调节记忆的保持和提取。

相似文献

1
Effects of morphine on memory: interactions with naloxone, propranolol and haloperidol.吗啡对记忆的影响:与纳洛酮、普萘洛尔和氟哌啶醇的相互作用。
Pharmacology. 1991;42(1):10-4. doi: 10.1159/000138762.
2
Memory facilitation by naloxone is due to release of dopaminergic and beta-adrenergic systems from tonic inhibition.纳洛酮对记忆的促进作用是由于多巴胺能和β-肾上腺素能系统从紧张性抑制中释放出来。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;67(3):265-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00431268.
3
Effects of ultra-low doses of morphine, naloxone and ethanol on morphine state-dependent memory of passive avoidance in mice.超低剂量吗啡、纳洛酮和乙醇对小鼠被动回避吗啡状态依赖性记忆的影响。
Behav Pharmacol. 2005 May;16(3):139-45. doi: 10.1097/00008877-200505000-00002.
4
Stress-dependent impairment of passive-avoidance memory by propranolol or naloxone.心得安或纳洛酮对被动回避记忆的应激依赖性损害。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2011 Jun;98(4):539-43. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
5
Morphine and propranolol co-administration impair consolidation of Y-maze spatial recognition memory.吗啡与普萘洛尔联合使用会损害Y迷宫空间识别记忆的巩固。
Brain Res. 2008 Sep 16;1230:150-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.061. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
6
Influence of central administration ATP-dependent K+ channel on morphine state-dependent memory of passive avoidance.中枢给予ATP依赖性钾通道对吗啡状态依赖的被动回避记忆的影响。
Eur J Pharmacol. 2004 Mar 8;487(1-3):143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.01.035.
7
Possible interaction between central cholinergic muscarinic and opioid peptidergic systems during memory consolidation in mice.
Behav Neural Biol. 1984 Mar;40(2):155-69. doi: 10.1016/s0163-1047(84)90255-3.
8
Possible mechanism of haloperidol-induced enhancement of memory retrieval.
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1991 Apr;13(3):161-4.
9
Gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157 counteracts morphine-induced analgesia in mice.胃泌素 15 肽(BPC 157)可拮抗吗啡诱导的小鼠镇痛作用。
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009 Dec;60 Suppl 7:177-81.
10
Memory enhancement with intra-amygdala post-training naloxone is blocked by concurrent administration of propranolol.杏仁核内训练后给予纳洛酮所带来的记忆增强作用被同时给予普萘洛尔所阻断。
Brain Res. 1989 Jan 2;476(1):94-101. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(89)91540-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive Alterations in Addictive Disorders: A Translational Approach.成瘾性障碍中的认知改变:一种转化方法。
Biomedicines. 2023 Jun 23;11(7):1796. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11071796.
2
Beauty and Uncertainty as Transformative Factors: A Free Energy Principle Account of Aesthetic Diagnosis and Intervention in Gestalt Psychotherapy.美与不确定性作为变革性因素:格式塔心理治疗中审美诊断与干预的自由能原理阐释
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 13;16:906188. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.906188. eCollection 2022.
3
Paternal morphine self-administration produces object recognition memory deficits in female, but not male offspring.
父本自我注射吗啡会导致雌性后代而非雄性后代出现物体识别记忆缺陷。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Apr;237(4):1209-1221. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05450-6. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
4
Aesthetic Chills: Knowledge-Acquisition, Meaning-Making, and Aesthetic Emotions.审美寒战:知识获取、意义建构与审美情感
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 4;7:1093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01093. eCollection 2016.
5
Effect of morphine on the persistence of long-term memory in rats.吗啡对大鼠长期记忆持久性的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 May;232(10):1747-53. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3811-z. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
6
Stress-dependent impairment of passive-avoidance memory by propranolol or naloxone.心得安或纳洛酮对被动回避记忆的应激依赖性损害。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2011 Jun;98(4):539-43. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
7
Corticotropin-releasing factor and noradrenergic signalling exert reciprocal control over startle reactivity.促肾上腺皮质释放因子和去甲肾上腺素能信号对惊跳反应施加相互的控制。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Oct;14(9):1179-94. doi: 10.1017/S1461145710001409. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
8
Effects of morphine on the plus-maze discriminative avoidance task: role of state-dependent learning.吗啡对十字迷宫辨别性回避任务的影响:状态依赖性学习的作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Jan;184(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0238-6. Epub 2005 Dec 10.