Dause Rania, Cobourne Martyn, McDonald Fraser
Department of Orthodontics, King's College London Dental Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Aust Orthod J. 2010 May;26(1):42-8.
To establish the sensitivity and specificity of the Korkhaus and Royal London Space Planning Analyses.
The sample consisted of 30 cases with two sets of study models and lateral cephalometric radiographs taken at least three years apart. These were then further subdivided into Class I (N = 10), Class II division 1 (N = 10) and Class II division 2 cases (N = 10). The Royal London Space Planning Analysis and the Korkhaus Analysis were applied on these cases at both times.
Study model analysis: The Royal London Planning Analysis revealed that in Class I malocclusions, upper and lower arch crowding and spacing changed significantly with time. The total space required and tooth size reduction for the lower arch had also changed significantly. Additionally, in the Class II division 1 malocclusions, lower arch crowding and spacing, total space required and the need for tooth size reduction had significantly increased, while in Class II division 2 malocclusions, a statistically significant increase was observed in the upper and lower arch crowding and spacing. The Korkhaus Analysis showed that in Class I malocclusions, a significant decrease was observed in the lower arch length and the lower anterior arch width. The upper posterior (inter-molar) arch width had significantly increased. In Class II division 1 malocclusions the lower right posterior space available had decreased significantly. The upper posterior arch width and the lower posterior arch width also significantly increased. In Class II division 2 malocclusions, a statistically significant decrease was observed in the lower anterior arch length. There were no significant changes in all angular and the two linear measurements for all classes.
The Royal London Space Planning Analysis and the Korkhause Analysis are clinically sensitive analyses. The Royal London Space Planning Analysis lacks specificity to be a robust model for treatment planning; modification may be required before this technique is accepted.
确定科尔克豪斯分析法和皇家伦敦空间规划分析法的敏感性和特异性。
样本包括30例患者,有两组研究模型以及间隔至少三年拍摄的头颅侧位片。这些病例进一步细分为I类(N = 10)、II类1分类(N = 10)和II类2分类病例(N = 10)。在两个时间点对这些病例应用皇家伦敦空间规划分析法和科尔克豪斯分析法。
研究模型分析:皇家伦敦规划分析法显示,在I类错牙合畸形中,上下牙弓拥挤度和牙弓间隙随时间有显著变化。下牙弓所需的总间隙和牙齿减径量也有显著变化。此外,在II类1分类错牙合畸形中,下牙弓拥挤度和牙弓间隙、所需总间隙以及牙齿减径需求显著增加,而在II类2分类错牙合畸形中,上下牙弓拥挤度和牙弓间隙有统计学意义的增加。科尔克豪斯分析法显示,在I类错牙合畸形中,下牙弓长度和下前牙弓宽度显著减小。上后牙(磨牙间)弓宽度显著增加。在II类1分类错牙合畸形中,右下后牙可用间隙显著减小。上后牙弓宽度和下后牙弓宽度也显著增加。在II类2分类错牙合畸形中,下前牙弓长度有统计学意义的减小。所有分类的所有角度和两个线性测量值均无显著变化。
皇家伦敦空间规划分析法和科尔克豪斯分析法在临床上具有敏感性。皇家伦敦空间规划分析法缺乏作为可靠治疗计划模型的特异性;在该技术被接受之前可能需要进行改进。