Zhen Ping, Liu Xing-Yan, Gao Ming-Xuan, Tian Qi
Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of PLA, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2010 May;23(5):332-5.
To investigate the therapeutic effect and operative characteristic of the anatomic plate and trapezoid plate for treament of the comminuted intertrochanteric fracture combined with trochanteric coronal position fracture.
From Jan. 1998 to Mar. 2007, 57 patients suffered from comminuted intertrochanteric fracture combined with trochanteric coronal position fracture were randomly divided into two groups, 21 patients in trapezoid plate group were treated with the trapezoid compression plate, included 11 males and 10 females with an average age of 41.8 years; and 36 patients in anatomic plate group were treated with the anatomic plate, included 17 males and 19 females with an average age of 42.1 years. All of the 57 fractures were A3 type according to AO classification. The functions of hip joints were evaluated according to the Harris hip functional standard score.
All 57 patients were followed-up for 5 months to 9 years and 3 months with an average of 4.8 years. The healing time of the fractures was from 8 to 20 weeks with an average of 12.8 weeks. The results of Harris scoring showed the pain scores of the anatomic plate group were higher than that of the trapezoid plate group (P < 0.05). The function scores of the anatomic plate group were higher than that of the trapezoid plate group (P < 0.01). There were no statistically significant different in the deformity and ranges of joint scores between two groups (P > 0.05).
In unstable comminuted intertrochanteric fracture combined with trochanteric coronal position fracture, the lateral wall of trochanteric is often destroyed. The anatomic plate and the trapeziod compression plate can provide effective internal fixation, while many othere internal fixation methods were limited in this kind of fracture. As compared with the anatomic plate fixation, the trapezoid compression plate fixation of comminuted intertrochanteric fracture combined with trochanteric coronal position fracture have several advantages, such as fewer complications, faster union of fracture and earlier recovery of joint functions.
探讨解剖钢板与梯形钢板治疗股骨转子间粉碎性骨折合并转子冠状位骨折的疗效及手术特点。
1998年1月至2007年3月,将57例股骨转子间粉碎性骨折合并转子冠状位骨折患者随机分为两组,梯形钢板组21例,采用梯形加压钢板治疗,男11例,女10例,平均年龄41.8岁;解剖钢板组36例,采用解剖钢板治疗,男17例,女19例,平均年龄42.1岁。57例骨折均按AO分类为A3型。根据Harris髋关节功能标准评分评估髋关节功能。
57例患者均获随访,时间5个月至9年3个月,平均4.8年。骨折愈合时间8~20周,平均12.8周。Harris评分结果显示,解剖钢板组疼痛评分高于梯形钢板组(P<0.05);解剖钢板组功能评分高于梯形钢板组(P<0.01)。两组在畸形和关节评分范围方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
在不稳定的股骨转子间粉碎性骨折合并转子冠状位骨折中,转子外侧壁常遭破坏。解剖钢板和梯形加压钢板均可提供有效的内固定,而其他许多内固定方法对此类骨折受限。与解剖钢板固定相比,梯形加压钢板固定股骨转子间粉碎性骨折合并转子冠状位骨折具有并发症少、骨折愈合快、关节功能恢复早等优点。