Sivasundaram Sujit
Department of International History, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, England.
Isis. 2010 Mar;101(1):95-7. doi: 10.1086/652690.
An interest in global histories of science is not new. Yet the project envisioned by this Focus section is different from that pursued by natural historians and natural philosophers in the early modern age. Instead of tracing universal patterns, there is value in attending to the connections and disconnections of science on the global stage. Instead of assuming the precision of science's boundaries, historians might consider the categories of "science" and "indigenous knowledge" to have emerged from globalization. New global histories of science will be characterized by critical reflection on the limits of generalization, as well as a creative adoption of new sources, methods, and chronologies, in an attempt to decenter the European history of science. Such a project holds the promise of opening up new conversations between historians, anthropologists, philosophers, and sociologists of science. It is of critical importance if the discipline is not to fragment into regional and national subfields or become dominated by structural frameworks such as imperialism.
对全球科学史的兴趣并非新鲜事物。然而,本专题所设想的项目与早期现代自然历史学家和自然哲学家所追求的项目不同。不再追寻普遍模式,关注全球舞台上科学的联系与脱节具有价值。不再假定科学边界的精确性,历史学家不妨认为“科学”和“本土知识”的类别是全球化的产物。新的全球科学史将以对概括局限性的批判性反思为特征,以及创造性地采用新资料、方法和年代学,试图使欧洲科学史不再占据中心地位。这样一个项目有望开启科学史家、人类学家、哲学家和社会学家之间的新对话。如果该学科不想分裂成区域和国家子领域,或被诸如帝国主义等结构框架主导,这一点至关重要。