• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗高级别前列腺癌的早期肿瘤学结果。

Early oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-grade prostate cancer.

机构信息

Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2010 Dec;106(11):1739-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09484.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09484.x
PMID:20575980
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the oncological outcomes of patients with specimen Gleason 8 and 9 prostate cancers and to determine factors that predict biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 4156 patients who underwent RARP from January 2001 to 2009, we identified 368 men with Gleason 8 or 9 tumours who met the inclusion criteria. BCR was defined as a PSA level of ≥0.2 ng/mL with a second rising value. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare BCRFS while factors that predict BCRFS were determined by Cox proportional hazards modelling.

RESULTS

The median age and PSA level were 62 years and 6.4 ng/mL for men with Gleason 8, and 63 years and 6.7 ng/mL for Gleason 9 cancers. The median (interquartile range, IQR) overall follow-up was 23 (10-46) months and 19 (7-37) months for Gleason 8 and 9 tumours, respectively. At 60 months the mean (se) overall BCRFS was 36 (5)% and for Gleason 8 it was 47 (6)% and for Gleason 9 it was 21 (7)% (P < 0.001). At 5 years, extraprostatic extension (pT3a) resulted in BCRFS of 52 (9)% for Gleason 8 tumours and 21 (11)% for Gleason 9 (P= 0.012). On multivariable analysis, lymph node invasion, specimen Gleason score, pathological stage and tumour volume predicted BCRFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Early results suggest RARP monotherapy performs comparably to RP for BCRFS in men with high-grade prostate cancer. There are significant oncological differences between Gleason 8 and 9 tumours.

摘要

目的

评估标本 Gleason 8 和 9 前列腺癌患者的肿瘤学结局,并确定预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后生化无复发生存(BCRFS)的因素。

患者与方法

2001 年 1 月至 2009 年期间,我们从接受 RARP 的 4156 例患者中,确定了符合纳入标准的 368 名 Gleason 8 或 9 肿瘤患者。BCR 定义为 PSA 水平≥0.2ng/mL 且第二次升高。采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和对数秩检验比较 BCRFS,同时采用 Cox 比例风险模型确定预测 BCRFS 的因素。

结果

Gleason 8 患者的中位年龄和 PSA 水平分别为 62 岁和 6.4ng/mL,Gleason 9 患者分别为 63 岁和 6.7ng/mL。Gleason 8 和 9 肿瘤的中位(四分位距,IQR)总随访时间分别为 23(10-46)个月和 19(7-37)个月。60 个月时,总体 BCRFS 的平均值(se)为 36(5)%,Gleason 8 为 47(6)%,Gleason 9 为 21(7)%(P<0.001)。5 年时,前列腺外扩展(pT3a)导致 Gleason 8 肿瘤的 BCRFS 为 52(9)%,Gleason 9 为 21(11)%(P=0.012)。多变量分析显示,淋巴结侵犯、标本 Gleason 评分、病理分期和肿瘤体积预测 BCRFS。

结论

早期结果表明,对于高级别前列腺癌患者,RARP 单药治疗与 RP 的 BCRFS 相当。Gleason 8 和 9 肿瘤之间存在显著的肿瘤学差异。

相似文献

1
Early oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-grade prostate cancer.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗高级别前列腺癌的早期肿瘤学结果。
BJU Int. 2010 Dec;106(11):1739-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09484.x.
2
Early oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-grade prostate cancer.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗高级别前列腺癌的早期肿瘤学结局
BJU Int. 2011 Mar;107(6):1009; author reply 1009-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10145_1.x.
3
Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的生化复发:1384 例患者的 5 年中位随访分析。
Eur Urol. 2010 Dec;58(6):838-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.09.010. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
4
Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques.前列腺癌根治术:开放性耻骨后与机器人辅助技术的配对比较
BJU Int. 2009 Feb;103(4):448-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08012.x. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
5
Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性长度作为生化复发的预测指标。
J Urol. 2009 Jul;182(1):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.139. Epub 2009 May 17.
6
Prediction of outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer of biopsy Gleason score ≥ 8 via contemporary multi (≥ 12)-core prostate biopsy.通过当代多(≥12 针)芯前列腺活检预测经活检证实的前列腺癌 Gleason 评分≥8 患者根治性前列腺切除术后的结局。
BJU Int. 2011 Jul;108(2):217-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09814.x. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
7
The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.前列腺重量在机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中的影响
J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):928-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.029. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
8
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘的发生率及位置比较。
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
9
Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术 10 年后的肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1168-1176. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.025. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
10
Pathological T2 sub-divisions as a prognostic factor in the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.前列腺癌生化复发的病理 T2 亚分期:预后因素。
BJU Int. 2010 Dec;106(11):1623-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09439.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel tool to predict lymph node metastasis in patients with prostate cancer based on clinical and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT parameters.一种基于临床和68Ga-PSMA PET/CT参数预测前列腺癌患者淋巴结转移的新型工具。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2025 Jul;19(7):E257-E263. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8917.
2
Surgical management of high-risk, localized prostate cancer.高危局限性前列腺癌的手术治疗
Nat Rev Urol. 2020 Dec;17(12):679-690. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-00384-7. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
3
Biopsy Detected Gleason Pattern 5 is Associated with Recurrence, Metastasis and Mortality in a Cohort of Men with High Risk Prostate Cancer.
活检检测到的格里森 5 型与高危前列腺癌患者队列中的复发、转移和死亡相关。
J Urol. 2017 Dec;198(6):1309-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
4
Comparative analysis of oncologic outcomes for open vs. robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.高危前列腺癌开放手术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术肿瘤学结局的比较分析
Korean J Urol. 2015 Aug;56(8):572-9. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.8.572. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
5
Robotic radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: current perspectives.高危前列腺癌的机器人根治性前列腺切除术:当前观点
Asian J Androl. 2015 Nov-Dec;17(6):908-15; discussion 913. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.153541.