Salvini E, Zincone G, Fossati N, Crivellaro M, Crespi A, Loda A, Paruccini N, Pastori R
Servizio di Radiodiagnostica, Ospedale S. Gerardo, Monza, Milano.
Radiol Med. 1991 May;81(5):705-8.
To date, the skeletal imaging capabilities of digital radiography with storage phosphors have been poorly investigated, and the diagnostic accuracy of this technique has not been thoroughly assessed. To evaluate the performance of storage phosphor digital radiography we compared 66 conventional and 66 digital radiographs of small abnormalities of the extremities (fractures, erosions, calcifications). Conventional images were obtained with a low-speed screen-film system while digital ones were acquired with high-resolution (5 lp/mm max) phosphors and laser-printed on a 8" x 10" film. Two experienced radiologists defined the gold standard (389 abnormalities) and four radiologists scored the findings (1,556 observations) on a five-point discrete scale. ROC analysis indicated film and storage radiography to be equally effective in the overall detection of abnormalities. No difference was found in the individual performances of the four readers, in the site subclasses (wrist, hand), and in the specific detection of fractures and erosions. Digital radiography proved to be superior to conventional radiography in the detection of calcifications in all sites and particularly in the wrist (p less than 0.05). Storage phosphor radiography may replace conventional radiography of the extremities without causing any significant decrease in diagnostic accuracy.
迄今为止,对于采用存储磷光体的数字放射成像的骨骼成像能力研究甚少,且该技术的诊断准确性尚未得到充分评估。为了评估存储磷光体数字放射成像的性能,我们比较了66例四肢小病变(骨折、糜烂、钙化)的传统X线片和66例数字X线片。传统图像采用低速增感屏-胶片系统获取,而数字图像则使用高分辨率(最大5线对/毫米)磷光体获取,并激光打印在8英寸×10英寸的胶片上。两位经验丰富的放射科医生确定了金标准(389处病变),四位放射科医生对检查结果(1556次观察)采用五点离散量表进行评分。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析表明,胶片放射成像和存储磷光体放射成像在总体病变检测中同样有效。在四位阅片者的个体表现、部位亚类(腕部、手部)以及骨折和糜烂的具体检测方面未发现差异。在所有部位,尤其是腕部,数字放射成像在钙化检测方面被证明优于传统放射成像(p<0.05)。存储磷光体放射成像可替代四肢的传统放射成像,而不会导致诊断准确性出现任何显著下降。