Department of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, University Hospital R. Poincaré (AP-HP, UVSQ), R. Poincaré Boulevard, F-92380 Garches, France.
Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Jan 30;204(1-3):139-43. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.05.022. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
The identification of X bodies is an everyday preoccupation in forensic pathology. This retrospective analysis studied all methods of identification and characteristics of unidentified bodies arrived in the Department of Forensic Medicine and Pathology (University Hospital R. Poincaré, Garches, France) during a 6-years period (2003-2009). The aim was to determine the identification methods used during all the forensic investigations, but also to study causes and manner of death in this sample of the population. A total of 9.1% of all autopsies were on X cadavers (217 cases out of 2384). On this total, only 134 of them have been included in our series after exclusion of archaeological and animal samples, but also of unidentified individuals or incomplete data available. Almost 28% of them have been identified with molecular biology (DNA), 23% with odontological examination, 7.5% with fingerprinting and 6.7% with autopsy data. Manner of death was mainly suicide (40.3%) especially by asphyxia following drowning, then accidental death (17.9%) especially consecutive to multiple trauma after traffic accident, acute carbon monoxide intoxication or carbonization in a fire. A total of 11.9% natural deaths were found (50% of them being of cardio-vascular origin) and 11.2% of homicides (with the use of firearm in a third of them). For 18.7% of X cadavers, the mode of death was undetermined. 46.4% of all unidentified bodies in our series were only identified by the police investigations, using physical recognition (direct or with photographs) or personal effects or identity documents in close relationship with the body. Our study highlights the fact that quite half of all unidentified bodies are inhumed with an identity not scientifically proved. Bodies which remained unidentified after all investigations represent 10.2% of X cadavers (if we consider a group of 176 cases composed of our study sample of 134 cases plus 24 subjects identified just before the autopsy and the 18 cases which remained unidentified) and 0.8% of all autopsies performed in the department.
X 体的鉴定是法医学中的日常关注点。本回顾性分析研究了在 6 年期间(2003-2009 年)到达法医学和病理学系(法国加榭的 R.波旁大学医院)的所有身份识别方法和身份不明尸体的特征。目的是确定在所有法医调查中使用的身份识别方法,同时研究该人群样本中的死因和死亡方式。所有尸检的 9.1%(2384 例尸检中有 217 例)为 X 尸体。在这总数中,仅排除考古和动物样本后,也排除身份不明的个人或可用数据不完整的情况下,我们的系列中包括了其中的 134 例。其中近 28%通过分子生物学(DNA)、23%通过牙科学检查、7.5%通过指纹识别和 6.7%通过尸检数据确定身份。死因主要是自杀(40.3%),特别是溺水后窒息,其次是意外死亡(17.9%),特别是交通事故后多发创伤、急性一氧化碳中毒或火灾中的碳化。共发现 11.9%的自然死亡(其中 50%为心血管源性)和 11.2%的凶杀案(其中三分之一使用了枪支)。对于 18.7%的 X 尸体,死因未确定。在我们的系列中,所有身份不明的尸体只有 46.4%通过警察调查确定身份,使用物理识别(直接或通过照片)或与尸体密切相关的个人物品或身份证件。我们的研究强调了这样一个事实,即所有身份不明的尸体中有近一半未经科学证明就被埋葬。所有调查后仍无法确定身份的尸体占 X 尸体的 10.2%(如果我们考虑一个由我们的研究样本中的 134 例加上尸检前确定身份的 24 例和 18 例仍未确定身份的案例组成的 176 例案例组),占该部门进行的所有尸检的 0.8%。