Stanford Nicky
Glasgow Dental School and Hospital, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Evid Based Dent. 2010;11(2):44. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400718.
The Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, Embase and LILACS . There were no language restrictions.
Randomised controlled trials (RCT) were considered that compared any intervention for treating displaced ankylosed permanent front teeth in individuals of any age.
Two independent review authors screened studies in duplicate. Although no studies were ultimately included, the authors had planned to extract data independently and to assess risk of bias following Cochrane Collaboration methods.
The search retrieved 77 references to studies. None matched the inclusion criteria and therefore were excluded.
There is no evidence from RCT about the comparative effectiveness of the different treatment options for ankylosed permanent front teeth. The lack of high-level evidence for the management of this health problem emphasises the need for well-designed clinical trials.
Cochrane口腔健康组试验注册库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、医学期刊数据库(Medline)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)和拉丁美洲及加勒比地区卫生科学数据库(LILACS)。无语言限制。
纳入比较任何年龄个体中治疗移位性强直恒前牙的任何干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)。
两名独立的综述作者对研究进行了重复筛选。尽管最终未纳入任何研究,但作者原计划独立提取数据,并按照Cochrane协作网方法评估偏倚风险。
检索到77篇相关研究参考文献。无一符合纳入标准,因此均被排除。
随机对照试验中没有证据表明不同治疗方案治疗强直恒前牙的相对有效性。针对这一健康问题缺乏高水平证据,凸显了开展精心设计的临床试验的必要性。