Suffolk University Law School, USA.
J Law Med Ethics. 2010 Summer;38(2):352-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00494.x.
The conventional wisdom is that managed care's brief life is over and we are now in a post-managed care era. In fact, managed care has a long history and continues to thrive. Writers also often assume that managed care is a fixed thing. They overlook that managed care has evolved and neglect to examine the role that it plays in the health system. Furthermore, private actors and the state have used managed care tools to promote diverse goals. These include the following: increasing access to medical care; restricting physician entrepreneurialism; challenging professional control over the medical economy; curbing medical spending; managing medical practice and markets; furthering the growth of medical markets and private insurance; promoting for-profit medical facilities and insurers; earning bounties for reducing medical expenditures: and reducing governmental responsibility for, and oversight of, medical care. Struggles over these competing goals spurred the metamorphosis of managed care. This article explores how managed care transformed physicians' conflicts of interests and responses to them. It also examines how managed care altered the opportunities for patients/medical consumers to use exit and voice to spur change.
传统观点认为管理式医疗的短暂生命已经结束,我们现在正处于后管理式医疗时代。事实上,管理式医疗有着悠久的历史,并且仍在蓬勃发展。作家们也常常认为管理式医疗是一成不变的。他们忽略了管理式医疗已经发生了演变,也没有注意到它在医疗体系中所扮演的角色。此外,私营部门和国家都使用管理式医疗工具来推动各种目标的实现。这些目标包括:增加医疗保健的可及性;限制医生的创业精神;挑战专业人士对医疗经济的控制;控制医疗支出;管理医疗实践和市场;促进医疗市场和私人保险的发展;推动营利性医疗机构和保险公司的发展;通过降低医疗支出获得奖励:减少政府对医疗保健的责任和监督。围绕这些相互竞争的目标展开的斗争推动了管理式医疗的变革。本文探讨了管理式医疗如何改变了医生的利益冲突及其应对方式。它还考察了管理式医疗如何改变了患者/医疗消费者利用退出和发声来推动变革的机会。