Reader in Human Genetics and Embryology, University College London Centre for Preimplantation Genetics and Diagnosis, Institute for Women's Health, University College London and Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Genetics & IVF Institute, Fairfax, Virginia.
Fertil Steril. 2010 Sep;94(4):1173-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.064. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
In preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), polymerase chain reaction has been used to detect monogenic disorders, and in PGD/preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been used to analyze chromosomes. Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using FISH-based PGS on cleavage-stage embryos and one on blastocyst-stage embryos have shown that PGS does not increase delivery rates. Is the failure of PGS due to a fundamental flaw in the idea, or are the techniques that are being used unable to overcome their own, inherent flaws? Array-based technology allows for analysis of all of the chromosomes. Two types of arrays are being developed for use in PGD; array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and single nucleotide polymorphism-based (SNP) arrays. Each array can determine the number of chromosomes, however, SNP-based arrays can also be used to haplotype the sample.
OBJECTIVE(S): To describe aCGH and SNP array technology and make suggestions for the future use of arrays in PGD and PGS.
CONCLUSION(S): If array-based testing is going to prove useful, three steps need to be taken: [1] Validation of the array platform on appropriate cell and tissue samples to allow for reliable testing, even at the single-cell level; [2] deciding which embryo stage is the best for biopsy: polar body, cleavage, or blastocyst stage; [3] performing RCTs to show improvement in delivery rates. If RCTs are able to show that array-based testing at the optimal stage for embryo biopsy increases delivery rates, this will be a major step forward for assisted reproductive technology patients around the world.
在胚胎植入前遗传学诊断(PGD)中,聚合酶链反应已被用于检测单基因疾病,而在 PGD/胚胎植入前遗传学筛查(PGS)中,荧光原位杂交(FISH)已被用于分析染色体。有 10 项基于 FISH 的胚胎卵裂期和一项胚胎囊胚期 PGS 的随机对照试验(RCT)表明,PGS 不会增加分娩率。PGS 的失败是由于该理念存在根本缺陷,还是由于所使用的技术无法克服自身固有的缺陷?基于阵列的技术允许对所有染色体进行分析。两种类型的阵列正在开发中,用于 PGD;比较基因组杂交(aCGH)和基于单核苷酸多态性的(SNP)阵列。每个阵列都可以确定染色体的数量,但是,基于 SNP 的阵列也可用于对样本进行单体型分析。
描述 aCGH 和 SNP 阵列技术,并对 PGD 和 PGS 中阵列的未来应用提出建议。
如果基于阵列的测试被证明是有用的,需要采取三个步骤:[1] 在适当的细胞和组织样本上验证阵列平台,以实现可靠的测试,即使在单细胞水平也是如此;[2] 确定胚胎活检的最佳阶段:极体、卵裂期还是囊胚期;[3] 进行 RCT 以显示分娩率的提高。如果 RCT 能够表明胚胎活检的最佳阶段的基于阵列的测试提高了分娩率,这将是全世界辅助生殖技术患者的重大进步。