Suppr超能文献

北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验。方法、患者特征及进展。

North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Methods, patient characteristics, and progress.

出版信息

Stroke. 1991 Jun;22(6):711-20. doi: 10.1161/01.str.22.6.711.

Abstract

Fifty North American centers have combined to evaluate the benefit of carotid endarterectomy in randomized patients who have experienced symptoms related to arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery and who have received either best medical therapy alone or best medical therapy plus carotid endarterectomy. The outcome events are nonfatal and fatal stroke or death. A three-tier system identifies and adjudicates the type, severity, and location of each stroke and the cause of any death. Data about patients submitted to carotid endarterectomy outside the trial are compiled at the Nonrandomized Data Center at the Mayo Clinic. Between December 27, 1987, and October 1, 1990, 1,212 patients were randomized, 596 to medical therapy, 616 to carotid endarterectomy. Cross-over from the medical to the surgical arm has been low (4.2%). Patients eligible for the trial, but not randomized totaled 1,044; their characteristics were similar to those randomized so that, for the type of symptomatic patient in this study, our conclusions about the benefit of carotid endarterectomy can be generalized. Patients excluded by medical criteria totaled 679. Another 1,591 had carotid endarterectomy, but either lacked the disease under study, were asymptomatic, or received inadequate investigation to meet entry criteria. We set sample size at 1,900 patients, with continuing enrollment. The Monitoring Committee reviews at intervals the confidential analyses performed on the groups with moderate (30-69%) and severe (70-99%) stenosis. Stopping rules will be invoked for one or both groups if unequivocal benefit or harm is identified.

摘要

五十个北美医疗中心联合起来,对患有与颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄相关症状、且接受了单纯最佳药物治疗或最佳药物治疗加颈动脉内膜切除术的随机分组患者进行颈动脉内膜切除术益处的评估。结局事件为非致命性和致命性中风或死亡。一个三层系统用于识别和判定每例中风的类型、严重程度和位置以及任何死亡的原因。在试验之外接受颈动脉内膜切除术的患者数据在梅奥诊所的非随机数据中心汇总。在1987年12月27日至1990年10月1日期间,1212例患者被随机分组,596例接受药物治疗,616例接受颈动脉内膜切除术。从药物治疗组转至手术治疗组的比例很低(4.2%)。符合试验条件但未被随机分组的患者共有1044例;他们的特征与被随机分组的患者相似,因此对于本研究中此类有症状患者,我们关于颈动脉内膜切除术益处的结论具有普遍性。因医学标准被排除的患者共有679例。另外1591例接受了颈动脉内膜切除术,但要么缺乏所研究的疾病、无症状,要么接受的检查不充分而不符合入组标准。我们将样本量设定为1900例患者,并持续招募。监测委员会定期审查对中度(30 - 69%)和重度(70 - 99%)狭窄组进行的保密分析。如果确定有明确的益处或危害,将对一组或两组启用停止规则。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验