Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, 150 New Scotland Ave., Albany, NY 12208, USA.
Brain Behav Immun. 2010 Oct;24(7):1116-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.05.002. Epub 2010 May 23.
The development of gene-targeting technologies has enabled research with immune system-related knockout mouse strains to advance our understanding of how cytokines and their receptors interact and influence a number of body systems, including the central nervous system (CNS). A critical issue when we are interpreting phenotypic data from these knockout strains is the potential role of genes other than the targeted one. Although many of the knockout strains have been made congenic on a C57BL/6 (B6) genetic background, there remains a certain amount of genetic material from the129 substrain that was used in the development of these strains. This genetic material could result in phenotypes incorrectly attributed to the targeted gene. We recently reported low-activity behavior in Il10(-/-) mice that was linked to this genetic material rather than the targeted gene itself. In the current study we confirm the generalizability of those earlier findings, by assessing behavior in Il18(-/-) and Il18r1(-/-) knockout mice. We identified low activity and high anxiety-like behaviors in Il18r1(-/-) mice, whereas Il18(-/-) mice displayed little anxiety-like behavior. Although Il18r1(-/-) mice are considered a congenic strain, we have identified substantial regions of 129P2-derived genetic material not only flanking the ablated Il18r1 on Chromosome 1, but also on Chromosomes 4, 5, 8, 10, and 14. Our studies suggest that residual 129-derived gene(s), rather than the targeted Il18r1 gene, is/are responsible for the low level of activity seen in the Il18r1(-/-) mice. Mapping studies are necessary to identify the gene or genes contributing to the low-activity phenotype.
基因靶向技术的发展使得我们能够利用免疫系统相关的基因敲除小鼠品系进行研究,从而深入了解细胞因子及其受体如何相互作用并影响包括中枢神经系统(CNS)在内的多个身体系统。当我们解释这些基因敲除品系的表型数据时,一个关键问题是除了目标基因之外,其他基因的潜在作用。尽管许多基因敲除品系已经在 C57BL/6(B6)遗传背景上进行了同源性分析,但在这些品系的开发过程中仍使用了来自 129 亚系的一定数量的遗传物质。这种遗传物质可能导致表型被错误地归因于目标基因。我们最近报道了 Il10(-/-) 小鼠的低活性行为,该行为与这种遗传物质有关,而不是与目标基因本身有关。在当前的研究中,我们通过评估 Il18(-/-) 和 Il18r1(-/-) 基因敲除小鼠的行为,证实了这些早期发现的普遍性。我们在 Il18r1(-/-) 小鼠中发现了低活性和高焦虑样行为,而 Il18(-/-) 小鼠则表现出很少的焦虑样行为。尽管 Il18r1(-/-) 小鼠被认为是同源性品系,但我们不仅在染色体 1 上的被切除的 Il18r1 周围,而且在染色体 4、5、8、10 和 14 上,都发现了大量的 129P2 衍生遗传物质。我们的研究表明,残留的 129 衍生基因(而非靶向的 Il18r1 基因)是导致 Il18r1(-/-) 小鼠低活性的原因。需要进行图谱研究以确定导致低活性表型的基因。