Arnold Joshua D, Dart Benjamin W, Barker Donald E, Maxwell Robert A, Burkholder Hans C, Mejia Vicente A, Smith Philip W, Longley Joy M
Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA.
Am Surg. 2010 Jun;76(6):563-70.
Venous thromboembolic disease is a significant source of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized trauma patients. Multiple drugs and dosing regimens have been suggested for pharmacoprophylaxis. In this study, we compared efficacy, complications, and cost of unfractionated heparin administered subcutaneously three times a day with standard-dosed enoxaparin for prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in adult trauma patients over 1 year. Patients admitted for greater than 72 hours who received pharmacoprophylaxis as part of a comprehensive DVT protocol were included. A change was made in the protocol from enoxaparin (30 mg twice a day or 40 mg per day) to heparin (5000 U three times a day) at midyear. Surveillance lower extremity venous ultrasound was performed according to established institutional guidelines. Data, including demographics, associated injuries, complications, and cost, were collected and analyzed. Four hundred seventy-six patients met inclusion criteria. Two hundred thirty-seven (49.8%) patients received enoxaparin and 239 (50.2%) received heparin. Proximal lower extremity DVTs were detected in 16 (6.75%) patients in the enoxaparin group and 17 (7.11%) in the heparin group (P = 0.999). Risk factors for DVT in these patients included spinal cord injury (P = 0.001) and closed head injury (P = 0.031). There was no difference between the incidence of pulmonary emboli and bleeding. There was an estimated yearly pharmacy cost savings of $135,606. In trauma patients, subcutaneous heparin dosed three times a day may be as effective as standard-dosed enoxaparin for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism without increased complications. Heparin three times a day for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis was associated with significant pharmaceutical cost savings.
静脉血栓栓塞性疾病是住院创伤患者发病和死亡的重要原因。已经提出了多种药物和给药方案用于药物预防。在本研究中,我们比较了每天皮下注射三次普通肝素与标准剂量依诺肝素在1年时间里预防成年创伤患者深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的疗效、并发症和成本。纳入了因综合DVT方案而接受药物预防且住院时间超过72小时的患者。年中时,方案从依诺肝素(每日两次30mg或每日40mg)改为肝素(每日三次5000U)。根据既定的机构指南进行下肢静脉超声监测。收集并分析包括人口统计学、相关损伤、并发症和成本等数据。476例患者符合纳入标准。237例(49.8%)患者接受依诺肝素治疗,239例(50.2%)患者接受肝素治疗。依诺肝素组有16例(6.75%)患者检测到近端下肢DVT,肝素组有17例(7.11%)(P = 0.999)。这些患者发生DVT的危险因素包括脊髓损伤(P = 0.001)和闭合性颅脑损伤(P = 0.031)。肺栓塞和出血的发生率没有差异。估计每年药房成本节省135,606美元。在创伤患者中,每天皮下注射三次肝素预防静脉血栓栓塞可能与标准剂量依诺肝素一样有效,且不会增加并发症。每天三次使用肝素预防静脉血栓栓塞可显著节省药物成本。