Ho Kwok M, Rao Sudhakar, Honeybul Stephen, Zellweger Rene, Wibrow Bradley, Lipman Jeffrey, Holley Anthony, Kop Alan, Geelhoed Elizabeth, Corcoran Tomas
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
School of Population Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):e016747. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016747.
Retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters have been increasingly used in patients with major trauma who have contraindications to anticoagulant prophylaxis as a primary prophylactic measure against venous thromboembolism (VTE). The benefits, risks and cost-effectiveness of such strategy are uncertain.
Patients with major trauma, defined by an estimated Injury Severity Score >15, who have contraindications to anticoagulant VTE prophylaxis within 72 hours of hospitalisation to the study centre will be eligible for this randomised multicentre controlled trial. After obtaining consent from patients, or the persons responsible for the patients, study patients are randomly allocated to either control or IVC filter, within 72 hours of trauma admission, in a 1:1 ratio by permuted blocks stratified by study centre. The primary outcomes are (1) the composite endpoint of (A) pulmonary embolism (PE) as demonstrated by CT pulmonary angiography, high probability ventilation/perfusion scan, transoesophageal echocardiography (by showing clots within pulmonary arterial trunk), pulmonary angiography or postmortem examination during the same hospitalisation or 90-day after trauma whichever is earlier and (B) hospital mortality; and (2) the total cost of treatment including the costs of an IVC filter, total number of CT and ultrasound scans required, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, procedures and drugs required to treat PE or complications related to the IVC filters. The study started in June 2015 and the final enrolment target is 240 patients. No interim analysis is planned; incidence of fatal PE is used as safety stopping rule for the trial.
Ethics approval was obtained in all four participating centres in Australia. Results of the main trial and each of the secondary endpoints will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
ACTRN12614000963628; Pre-results.
对于有抗凝预防禁忌证的重大创伤患者,可回收下腔静脉(IVC)滤器作为预防静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的主要预防性措施的使用越来越多。这种策略的益处、风险和成本效益尚不确定。
预计损伤严重程度评分>15的重大创伤患者,在入住研究中心72小时内有抗凝VTE预防禁忌证,将符合这项随机多中心对照试验的条件。在获得患者或其负责人的同意后,研究患者在创伤入院72小时内,按研究中心分层,通过置换区组以1:1的比例随机分配至对照组或IVC滤器组。主要结局为:(1)复合终点:(A)通过CT肺动脉造影、高概率通气/灌注扫描、经食管超声心动图(显示肺动脉主干内血栓)、肺动脉造影或尸检证实的肺栓塞(PE),在同一住院期间或创伤后90天内(以较早者为准);(B)医院死亡率;以及(2)治疗总成本,包括IVC滤器成本、所需CT和超声扫描总数、重症监护病房和住院时间、治疗PE或与IVC滤器相关并发症所需的程序和药物成本。该研究于2015年6月开始,最终入组目标为240名患者。不计划进行中期分析;致命PE的发生率用作试验的安全停止规则。
在澳大利亚的所有四个参与中心均获得了伦理批准。主要试验结果和每个次要终点将提交至同行评审期刊发表。
ACTRN12614000963628;预结果。