Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Oecologia. 2010 Oct;164(2):431-44. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1685-2. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
Endophytic fungal symbionts of grasses are well known for their protective benefit of herbivory reduction. However, the majority of studies on endophyte-grass symbioses have been conducted on economically important, agricultural species-particularly tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne)-raising the hypothesis that strong benefits are the product of artificial selection. We examined whether fungal endophytes found in natural populations of native grass species deterred insect herbivores. By testing several native grass-endophyte symbiota, we examined phylogenetic signals in the effects of endophytes on insects and compared the relative importance of herbivore and symbiotum identity in the outcome of the interactions. Preference was assessed using three herbivore species [Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera), Schistocerca americana (Orthoptera), Rhopalosiphum padi (Hemiptera)] and ten native symbiota, which spanned seven grass genera. We also assessed herbivore performance in a no choice experiment for five native symbiota against S. frugiperda. We compared greenhouse and laboratory trials with natural levels of herbivory measured in experimental field populations. In all cases, we included the agronomic grass species, L. arundinaceum, to compare with results from the native grasses. Both in the field and in experimental trials, herbivores showed a significant preference for endophyte-free plant material for the majority of native grasses, with up to three times lower herbivory for endophyte-symbiotic plants; however, the degree of response depended on the identity of the herbivore species. Endophyte presence also significantly reduced performance of S. frugiperda for the majority of grass species. In contrast, the endophyte in L. arundinaceum had few significant anti-herbivore effects, except for a reduction in herbivory at one of two field sites. Our results demonstrate that the mechanisms by which native symbionts deter herbivores are at least as potent as those in model agricultural systems, despite the absence of artificial selection.
内生真菌共生体对草类的保护作用众所周知,可以减少食草动物的危害。然而,大多数关于内生真菌-草共生体的研究都是在经济上重要的农业物种上进行的,特别是高羊茅(Lolium arundinaceum)和多年生黑麦草(Lolium perenne),这就提出了一个假设,即强大的益处是人工选择的产物。我们研究了在天然种群中发现的内生真菌是否能阻止昆虫食草动物。通过测试几种本地草-内生真菌共生体,我们研究了内生真菌对昆虫影响的系统发育信号,并比较了食草动物和共生体身份在相互作用结果中的相对重要性。通过使用三种食草动物物种[夜蛾(鳞翅目)、美洲蟋蟀(直翅目)、禾谷缢管蚜(半翅目)]和十种本地共生体来评估偏好,这些共生体跨越了七个草属。我们还评估了五种本地共生体对 S. frugiperda 的无选择实验中的食草动物表现。我们将温室和实验室试验与实验田间种群中自然水平的食草动物进行了比较。在所有情况下,我们都包括了农业草种,高羊茅,以与来自本地草的结果进行比较。无论是在野外还是在实验试验中,食草动物对大多数本地草的内生真菌自由植物材料都表现出明显的偏好,而内生真菌共生植物的食草动物数量减少了高达三倍;然而,响应的程度取决于食草动物物种的身份。内生真菌的存在也显著降低了大多数草种中 S. frugiperda 的表现。相比之下,高羊茅中的内生真菌除了在两个野外地点中的一个地点减少了食草动物的危害外,对食草动物的影响很少。我们的研究结果表明,尽管缺乏人工选择,内生共生体阻止食草动物的机制至少与模型农业系统中的机制一样有效。