The Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Oct-Dec;14(4):425-32. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2010.493986.
BACKGROUND: The elderly utilize emergency medical services (EMS) at a higher rate than younger patients, yet little is known about the influence of injury on subsequent EMS utilization and costs. OBJECTIVE: To assess injury hospitalization as a potential marker for subsequent EMS utilization and costs by Medicare patients. METHODS: This observational study analyzed a retrospective cohort of all Medicare patients (> or = 67 years old) with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) injury diagnosis admitted to 125 Oregon and Washington hospitals during 2001 and 2002 who survived to hospital discharge. The numbers of EMS transports and the total EMS costs were compared one year before and one year following the index hospitalization. RESULTS: There were 30,655 injured elders in our cohort. Their median ICD-9-based injury severity score was 0.97, with 4.1% meeting a definition of serious injury and 37% having hip fractures. The mean (range) numbers of EMS transports before and after the injury were 0.5 (0-45) and 0.9 (0-56), for an unadjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 1.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-1.8). The increase in EMS utilization following an injury hospitalization was even greater after adjusting for risk period and other model predictors (IRR 2.4, 95% CI 2.3-2.5). Annual mean EMS costs rose 74% following the injury hospitalization, from $211 to $367 per person. The greatest increase was in nonemergent EMS use, accounting for 67% of the increase in the number of uses. Institutionalization in a skilled nursing or rehabilitation facility either before or after injury was strongly associated with the need for EMS care. CONCLUSION: An injury hospitalization in the elderly serves as a sentinel marker for an abrupt increase in EMS utilization and costs, even after accounting for confounders.
背景:老年人使用紧急医疗服务(EMS)的比率高于年轻患者,但对于伤害对随后的 EMS 使用和成本的影响知之甚少。
目的:评估伤害住院是否可以作为 Medicare 患者随后使用 EMS 和成本的潜在标志物。
方法:这项观察性研究分析了 2001 年至 2002 年期间,125 家俄勒冈州和华盛顿州医院收治的所有 Medicare 患者(>或= 67 岁)的回顾性队列,这些患者的国际疾病分类,第九版(ICD-9)有伤害诊断且存活至出院。比较了索引住院前后一年的 EMS 转运次数和 EMS 总费用。
结果:我们的队列中有 30655 名受伤的老年人。他们的 ICD-9 基于的伤害严重程度评分中位数为 0.97,其中 4.1%符合严重伤害的定义,37%有髋部骨折。受伤前后 EMS 转运的平均(范围)次数分别为 0.5(0-45)和 0.9(0-56),未调整的发病率比(IRR)为 1.7(95%置信区间 [CI] 1.7-1.8)。调整风险期和其他模型预测因素后,伤害住院后 EMS 使用的增加更为显著(IRR 2.4,95% CI 2.3-2.5)。受伤住院后,每年的 EMS 费用平均增加 74%,从每人 211 美元增加到 367 美元。增长最大的是非紧急 EMS 使用,占使用次数增加的 67%。受伤前后在熟练护理或康复机构住院与 EMS 护理的需求密切相关。
结论:老年人的伤害住院是 EMS 使用和成本突然增加的一个明显标志,即使考虑了混杂因素也是如此。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012-7
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2014-6
Natl Health Stat Report. 2008-8-6
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008-6
Am J Public Health. 2005-2