Department of Gastrointestinal, Emerging, and Zoonotic Infections, Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections, London, United Kingdom.
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010 Nov;7(11):1373-9. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2010.0568. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
A retrospective case-control study of listeriosis in patients in England aged over 60 years is described. The incidence of listeriosis in patients aged ≥60 years in England has doubled since 2001; hence, the investigation of risk factors for infection in this group is important to inform on prevention and control. Standardized epidemiological information has been sought on cases since 2005, but the value of the data accrued is limited without some perception of exposure prevalence in the population at risk of listeriosis. The exposures of listeriosis cases aged ≥60 years reported in England from 2005 to 2008 were compared to those of market research panel members representing the same population (i.e., residents of England aged ≥60 years) and time period. Exposures were grouped to facilitate comparison. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Cases were more likely than panel members to report the consumption of cooked meats (beef and ham/pork, but not poultry), cooked fish (specifically smoked salmon) and shellfish (prawns), dairy products (most noticeably milk but also certain cheeses), and mixed salads. They were less likely to report the consumption of other forms of seafood, dairy spread, other forms of dairy, sandwiches, and fresh vegetables. The diversity of high-risk food exposures reflects the ubiquity of the microorganism in the environment and/or the susceptibility of those at risk, and suggests that a wider variety of foods can give rise to listeriosis. Food safety advice on avoiding listeriosis should be adapted accordingly. While not inexpensive, the application of market research data to infectious disease epidemiology can add value to routine surveillance data.
一项针对英格兰 60 岁以上李斯特菌病患者的回顾性病例对照研究描述如下。自 2001 年以来,英格兰 60 岁以上患者李斯特菌病的发病率增加了一倍;因此,调查该人群感染的危险因素对于预防和控制具有重要意义。自 2005 年以来,一直在寻求有关病例的标准化流行病学信息,但如果没有对李斯特菌病高危人群的暴露率的一些了解,所积累的数据的价值是有限的。对 2005 年至 2008 年英格兰报告的 60 岁以上李斯特菌病病例的暴露情况与同一人群(即英格兰 60 岁以上的居民)和同期的市场研究小组的成员进行了比较。为了便于比较,将暴露情况进行了分组。计算了比值比和 95%置信区间。与小组的成员相比,病例更有可能报告食用熟肉(牛肉和火腿/猪肉,但不是禽肉)、熟鱼(特别是熏鲑鱼)和贝类(对虾)、奶制品(尤其是牛奶,但也包括某些奶酪)和混合沙拉。他们更不可能报告食用其他形式的海鲜、奶制品涂抹酱、其他形式的奶制品、三明治和新鲜蔬菜。高风险食品暴露的多样性反映了该微生物在环境中的普遍存在和/或高危人群的易感性,表明更广泛的食品种类可能导致李斯特菌病。应相应调整避免李斯特菌病的食品安全建议。虽然市场研究数据并不便宜,但将其应用于传染病流行病学可以为常规监测数据增加价值。