Henkes H, Brew S, Felber S, Miloslavski E, Mogilevski G, Tavrovski I, Kühne D
Klinik für Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus, Essen, Germany -
Interv Neuroradiol. 2004 Sep 30;10(3):189-201. doi: 10.1177/159101990401000301. Epub 2005 Jan 5.
Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with electrolytically detachable coils is often claimed to be based on electrothrombosis, i.e. intra-aneurysmal thrombus formation through applied direct current. Despite the fact that this concept was described more than a century ago, the significance of electrothrombosis in the endovascular treatment of aneurysms remains debatable. Apart from electrothrombosis, mechanical obliteration of the aneurysmal lumen might be one of the many possible mechanisms to explain why and how detachable coils are effective in preventing aneurysms from (re-)rupture. The purpose of this experimental study was to investigate to what extent direct current comparable to that used for coil detachment would influence the adhesion of cellular and liquid blood components to the surface of electrolytically detachable platinum coils. For the in vitro study, electrolytically detachable platinum coils of various types were exposed to stagnant heparinised blood for a total of 16 h, without or with applied direct current for 30 or 90 s (1 mA, 4-6 V, coil as anode). For the in vivo study, electrolytically detachable platinum coils were exposed to flowing blood for 180 s, without or with applied direct current (2 mA, 4-6 V, coil as either anode or cathode), without anti-coagulation and after intravenous administration of 5000 U Heparin and again after the intravenous administration of 500 mg Aspisol in addition to Heparin. After exposure to blood according to these different experimental protocols, the coils were fixed in formalin solution, gold coated and examined by scanning electron microscopy. Thrombus formation on the surface of all unfibred coils was thin and highly variable both from coil to coil, and on different areas of any given coil. The application of direct current minimally enhanced thrombus formation in stagnant blood in vitro, but not in vivo. The cellular and fibrin adhesions on the coil surfaces without and with applied current did not effectively increase the diameter or volume of unfibred coils. Coils with attached nylon fibres, however, proved to be highly thrombogenic without or with application of current. In fibred coils, surface adhesions without and with applied current were voluminous enough to effectively increase the diameter of the coil, potentially important for the process of endosaccular aneurysm occlusion. Electrothrombosis plays no role in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with electrolytically detachable coils. This explains why platinum coils with non-electrolytic detachment mechanisms show a similar efficiency and recurrence rate.
使用电解可脱卸弹簧圈进行颅内动脉瘤的血管内治疗通常被认为是基于电血栓形成,即通过施加直流电在动脉瘤内形成血栓。尽管这一概念早在一个多世纪前就已被描述,但电血栓形成在动脉瘤血管内治疗中的意义仍存在争议。除了电血栓形成外,动脉瘤腔的机械闭塞可能是解释可脱卸弹簧圈为何以及如何有效预防动脉瘤(再)破裂的众多可能机制之一。本实验研究的目的是调查与用于弹簧圈脱卸的直流电相当的电流会在多大程度上影响细胞和血液液体成分与电解可脱卸铂弹簧圈表面的黏附。在体外研究中,将各种类型的电解可脱卸铂弹簧圈暴露于含肝素的静态血液中总共16小时,不通电或施加直流电30或90秒(1毫安,4 - 6伏,弹簧圈作为阳极)。在体内研究中,将电解可脱卸铂弹簧圈暴露于流动血液中180秒,不通电或施加直流电(2毫安,4 - 6伏,弹簧圈作为阳极或阴极),不进行抗凝,在静脉注射5000单位肝素后以及在静脉注射500毫克阿司匹林(除肝素外)后再次进行。按照这些不同的实验方案使弹簧圈接触血液后,将弹簧圈固定在福尔马林溶液中,进行镀金处理并通过扫描电子显微镜检查。所有无纤维弹簧圈表面的血栓形成都很薄,并且在不同弹簧圈之间以及任何给定弹簧圈的不同区域都高度可变。在体外静态血液中施加直流电对血栓形成的增强作用极小,但在体内则不然。不通电和通电情况下弹簧圈表面的细胞和纤维蛋白黏附并没有有效地增加无纤维弹簧圈的直径或体积。然而,带有附着尼龙纤维的弹簧圈,无论是否通电,都被证明具有高度血栓形成性。在有纤维的弹簧圈中,不通电和通电情况下的表面黏附物足够多,足以有效地增加弹簧圈的直径,这对囊内动脉瘤闭塞过程可能很重要。电血栓形成在使用电解可脱卸弹簧圈进行颅内动脉瘤的血管内治疗中不起作用。这就解释了为什么具有非电解脱卸机制的铂弹簧圈显示出相似的效率和复发率。