Suppr超能文献

In vitro comparison of digital and conventional bitewing radiographs.

作者信息

Aps Johan K M, Berkhout Erwin, Goren Arthur D

出版信息

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Jul;39(5):320; author reply 321. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/69119164.

Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
In vitro comparison of digital and conventional bitewing radiographs.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Jul;39(5):320; author reply 321. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/69119164.
3
Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007 Dec;36(8):495-9. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/13319800.
5
Effect of tube potential and image receptor on the detection of natural proximal caries in primary teeth.
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Dec;15(6):901-7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0461-3. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
6
Effect of display type, DICOM calibration and room illuminance in bitewing radiographs.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(1):20150129. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150129. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
8
Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(4):20150326. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150326. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验