• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机对照试验对有保险的非常低收入女性进行乳房 X 光检查干预。

Randomized controlled trial of mammography intervention in insured very low-income women.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th Street, HLS 588, Miami, FL 33199, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Jul;19(7):1790-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0141. Epub 2010 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0141
PMID:20587669
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The expectation that insurance coverage mitigates health disparities and equalizes use of healthcare assumes that services are equally accessed; however, the insured low-income target population in this research had a mammography rate of 23.4%, well below the general population. Our objective was to determine the most effective intervention to improve mammography use in low-income women insured by a managed care organization (MCO).

METHODS

The study was a randomized controlled trial. Participants were 2,357 women noncompliant with screening mammography randomly assigned to one of three groups: control (n = 786) received usual care; simple intervention (n = 785) received prompt letter from the MCO medical director; and stepwise intervention (n = 786) received the same prompt letter from the MCO; if noncompliant, a second prompt letter from their primary care physician and, if still noncompliant, counseling from lay health workers. Outcome was completion of screening mammography extracted from medical records.

RESULTS

Screening rates were 13.4% for the control, 16.1% for the simple intervention, and 27.1% for the stepwise intervention. Compared with the control, the primary care physician letter in the stepwise intervention increased the likelihood of screening by 80% [Relative Risk (RR) = 1.80; P < 0.001], and counseling tripled the likelihood of screening (RR = 3.11; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the control and simple intervention, a stepwise intervention to increase mammography is effective in a target population of hard-to-reach, low-income, insured women.

IMPACT

The research provides evidence for the impact of stepwise interventions to improve cancer screening in low-income insured populations, although the screening rates remain well below those of the general population.

摘要

背景

保险覆盖范围减轻健康差距和平等利用医疗保健的期望假设服务同样可以获得;然而,这项研究中的被保险的低收入目标人群的乳房 X 光检查率为 23.4%,远低于一般人群。我们的目标是确定最有效的干预措施,以提高受管理式医疗组织 (MCO) 保险的低收入女性的乳房 X 光检查使用率。

方法

该研究是一项随机对照试验。参与者是 2357 名不符合筛查性乳房 X 光检查的女性,随机分为三组:对照组(n = 786)接受常规护理;简单干预组(n = 785)收到 MCO 医疗主任的即时信函;逐步干预组(n = 786)收到 MCO 的相同即时信函;如果仍未合规,他们的初级保健医生会再发一封即时信函,如果仍未合规,会由非专业医疗保健人员提供咨询。结果是从医疗记录中提取的筛查性乳房 X 光检查完成情况。

结果

对照组的筛查率为 13.4%,简单干预组为 16.1%,逐步干预组为 27.1%。与对照组相比,逐步干预组中的初级保健医生信函增加了筛查的可能性 80%[相对风险 (RR) = 1.80;P < 0.001],咨询将筛查的可能性增加了两倍(RR = 3.11;P < 0.001)。

结论

与对照组和简单干预组相比,逐步干预措施可有效提高难以接触到的、低收入、受保女性的乳房 X 光检查率。

影响

该研究为提高低收入参保人群癌症筛查率的逐步干预措施提供了证据,尽管筛查率仍远低于一般人群。

相似文献

1
Randomized controlled trial of mammography intervention in insured very low-income women.随机对照试验对有保险的非常低收入女性进行乳房 X 光检查干预。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Jul;19(7):1790-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0141. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
2
The cost effectiveness of 5 interventions to increase mammography adherence in a managed care population.在管理式医疗人群中提高乳腺X线摄影依从性的5种干预措施的成本效益。
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Jan;9(1):33-44.
3
Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40-64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005.1993年和2005年美国40至64岁女性在乳房X光检查使用方面存在的种族、族裔、收入及健康保险状况差异。
Med Care. 2008 Jul;46(7):692-700. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817893b1.
4
Initial and repeat mammography screening in a low income multi-ethnic population in Los Angeles.洛杉矶低收入多民族人群的初次及重复乳腺钼靶筛查
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995 Mar;4(2):161-7.
5
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple outcalls to promote mammography among low-income women.多次外呼促进低收入女性乳腺钼靶检查的有效性和成本效益
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000 Sep;9(9):923-31.
6
Is cost a barrier to screening mammography for low-income women receiving Medicare benefits? A randomized trial.对于领取医疗保险福利的低收入女性而言,费用是否会成为其进行乳腺钼靶筛查的障碍?一项随机试验。
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Jun 13;154(11):1217-24.
7
Impact of a mailed intervention on annual mammography and physician breast examinations among women at high risk of breast cancer.邮寄干预措施对乳腺癌高危女性年度乳房X光检查和医生乳腺检查的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996 Jan;5(1):71-6.
8
Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.基于网络的主动式乳腺癌筛查改善系统:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 26;167(6):606-11. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.6.606.
9
A randomized intervention to improve ongoing participation in mammography.一项旨在提高乳腺钼靶检查持续参与率的随机干预措施。
Am J Manag Care. 2001 Sep;7(9):887-94.
10
A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.三种针对性干预措施提高乳腺钼靶筛查率的成本效益比较。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004 Oct;13(8):909-18. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2004.13.909.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the profile of community health workers in breast cancer screening education: women's preferences and insights from a qualitative focus group study.了解社区卫生工作者在乳腺癌筛查教育中的概况:基于定性焦点小组研究的女性偏好与见解
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jul 4;24(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02508-0.
2
Accounting for extent of non-compliance when estimating treatment effects on an ordinal outcome in randomized clinical trials.在随机临床试验中估计对有序结局的治疗效果时考虑不依从的程度。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02493-6.
3
Advancing health equity in improving breast cancer screening with the use of a mobile mammography bus in marginalised population: quality improvement project.
利用移动乳腺摄影车改善边缘化人群乳腺癌筛查以促进健康公平:质量改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jan 4;13(1):e002482. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002482.
4
Video Interventions for Reducing Health Inequity in Cancer Screening Programmes: a Systematic Review.视频干预措施对减少癌症筛查计划中的健康不平等:系统评价。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Oct;11(5):2898-2924. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01749-5. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
5
Interventions to reduce cancer screening inequities: the perspective and role of patients, advocacy groups, and empowerment organizations.减少癌症筛查不公平现象的干预措施:患者、倡导团体和赋权组织的观点和作用。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jan 27;22(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01841-6.
6
Community Health Workers to Increase Cancer Screening: 3 Community Guide Systematic Reviews.社区卫生工作者促进癌症筛查:3 项社区指南系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Apr;64(4):579-594. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.10.016. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
7
Addressing Disparities Related to Access of Multimodality Breast Imaging Services Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.解决 COVID-19 大流行前后与多模态乳房成像服务获取相关的差异。
Acad Radiol. 2022 Dec;29(12):1852-1860. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.03.017. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
8
Interventions to improve adherence to surveillance guidelines in survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review.干预措施以提高儿童癌症幸存者对监测指南的依从性:系统评价。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Oct;13(5):713-729. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00790-w. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
9
Patient navigators for people with chronic disease: A systematic review.慢性病患者的患者导航员:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 20;13(2):e0191980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191980. eCollection 2018.
10
A national cluster-randomised controlled trial to examine the effect of enhanced reminders on the socioeconomic gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening.一项全国性整群随机对照试验,旨在研究强化提醒对肠癌筛查接受率社会经济梯度的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2016 Dec 6;115(12):1479-1486. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.365. Epub 2016 Nov 22.