Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Center for the Promotion of Treatment Adherence and Self-Management, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jul;33(7):1658-64. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2268.
To review interventions with adherence-promoting components and document their impact on glycemic control via meta-analysis.
Data from 15 studies that met the following criteria were subjected to meta-analysis: 1) randomized, controlled trial, 2) study sample included youth aged <19 years, 3) youth had type 1 diabetes, 4) study reported results on glycemic control; and 5) study reported use of adherence- or self-management-promoting components.
The 15 studies included 997 youth with type 1 diabetes. The mean effect size for pre- to posttreatment change for the intervention versus control group comparison was 0.11 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.23). This is a small effect, demonstrating very modest improvements in glycemic control. However, analysis for the pre- to posttreatment effects for the intervention group alone did show significant variability [Q(14) = 33.11; P < 0.05]. Multicomponent interventions, those that targeted emotional, social, or family processes that facilitate diabetes management, were more potent than interventions just targeting a direct, behavioral process (e.g., increase in blood glucose monitoring frequency).
Interventions that focus on direct, behavioral processes and neglect emotional, social, and family processes are unlikely to have an impact on glycemic control; multicomponent interventions showed more robust effects on A1C. Future clinical research should focus on refining interventions and gathering more efficacy and effectiveness data on health outcomes of the pediatric patients treated with these interventions.
通过荟萃分析,回顾具有促进依从性成分的干预措施,并记录其对血糖控制的影响。
符合以下标准的 15 项研究的数据进行荟萃分析:1)随机对照试验,2)研究样本包括年龄<19 岁的青少年,3)青少年患有 1 型糖尿病,4)研究报告了血糖控制结果;5)研究报告了使用依从性或自我管理促进成分。
15 项研究共纳入 997 例 1 型糖尿病青少年。干预组与对照组治疗前后变化的平均效应大小为 0.11(95%CI-0.01 至 0.23)。这是一个小的影响,表明血糖控制有非常适度的改善。然而,对干预组治疗前后的效果进行分析表明,存在显著的变异性[Q(14)=33.11;P<0.05]。多组分干预措施,即针对促进糖尿病管理的情绪、社会或家庭过程的干预措施,比仅针对直接、行为过程(例如,增加血糖监测频率)的干预措施更有效。
专注于直接、行为过程而忽略情绪、社会和家庭过程的干预措施不太可能对血糖控制产生影响;多组分干预措施对 A1C 显示出更强的效果。未来的临床研究应侧重于改进干预措施,并收集更多关于接受这些干预措施治疗的儿科患者健康结果的疗效和有效性数据。