Department of Neurosurgery, Rudolf Magnus Institute for Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, PO box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010 Sep;152(9):1603-8; discussion 1608-9. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0717-3. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
To compare intracranial feasibility of the conventional Excimer laser assisted non-occlusive anastomosis (ELANA) with the new experimental sutureless ELANA (SELANA).
Four pressurized human cadaver heads were bilaterally trepanated, using a combined pterional/pretemporal/transcavernous approach. In each head, seven ELANA anastomoses and seven contralateral SELANA anastomoses were constructed on (1) the proximal PCA/basilar artery (P1 segment/basilar artery; BA), (2) the distal posterior cerebral artery (PCA, P2 segment), (3) the supraclinoidal internal carotid artery (ICA), (4) the ICA bifurcation, (5) the proximal anterior cerebral artery (ACA, A1 segment), (6) the proximal middle cerebral artery (MCA, M1 segment), and (7) the distal MCA (M2 segment).
In total, 26 of 28 ELANA anastomoses (93%) and 22 of 28 SELANA anastomoses (79%) could be completed. Two ELANA anastomoses on the BA could not be finished because of limited space. Six SELANA anastomoses could not be attached because the applicator did not facilitate an angulated anastomosis spot. Of the remaining anastomoses, more ELANA (eight) than SELANA (two) anastomoses could not be realized without manipulation of surrounding structures. The SELANA anastomoses were completed significantly faster than the ELANA, mean difference ranging from 11 min on the M2 to 107 min on the P1/BA.
This comparative study shows potential advantages of the SELANA anastomosis over the ELANA anastomosis because during application, it causes less manipulation of surrounding structures while it is faster and easier. Further preclinical research should be performed in order to improve SELANA feasibility on angulated anastomosis spots and to assess long-term SELANA patency and endothelialization.
比较传统准分子激光辅助非闭塞吻合术(ELANA)与新型实验性无缝线 ELANA(SELANA)的颅内可行性。
使用联合翼点/颞前/海绵窦入路对 4 个人压头颅双侧钻孔。在每个头颅中,在(1)PCA/基底动脉近端(P1 段/基底动脉)、(2)大脑后动脉远端(PCA,P2 段)、(3)颈内动脉虹吸段、(4)颈内动脉分叉处、(5)大脑前动脉近端(ACA,A1 段)、(6)大脑中动脉近端(MCA,M1 段)和(7)大脑中动脉远端(M2 段)上构建了 7 个 ELANA 吻合术和 7 个对侧 SELANA 吻合术。
总共完成了 28 个 ELANA 吻合术中的 26 个(93%)和 28 个 SELANA 吻合术中的 22 个(79%)。由于空间有限,2 个 BA 上的 ELANA 吻合术无法完成。由于器械不利于成角吻合部位,6 个 SELANA 吻合术无法附着。在其余吻合术中,更多的 ELANA(8 个)而不是 SELANA(2 个)吻合术无法在不操作周围结构的情况下实现。SELANA 吻合术完成速度明显快于 ELANA,平均差值范围从 M2 上的 11 分钟到 P1/BA 上的 107 分钟。
这项比较研究表明,SELANA 吻合术具有优于 ELANA 吻合术的潜力,因为在应用过程中,它对周围结构的操作较少,同时速度更快,操作更容易。为了提高 SELANA 在成角吻合部位的可行性,并评估 SELANA 的长期通畅性和内皮化,应进一步进行临床前研究。