Comparative Biology and Safety Sciences, Amgen, Inc., Seattle WA, USA.
J Appl Toxicol. 2010 Jul;30(5):387-96. doi: 10.1002/jat.1551.
Biopharmaceuticals represent significant advances in therapeutic approaches for unmet medical needs, and increasingly, traditional pharmaceutical firms have been incorporating biotechnology capabilities into their product portfolios. There are some differences in the overall safety testing paradigms for small molecules and biopharmaceuticals, this safety testing including both quality and toxicology aspects. These differences are associated with both the manufacturing processes involved and the molecules themselves. For example, for biopharmaceuticals, living cells represent the factories for synthesizing complex molecular entities. As a result of this, safety testing for this class of drugs includes adventitious agent testing (e.g. viral, mycoplasma, transmissible spongiform encephalopathy agents) not normally needed for small molecules. Also, strategies for nonclinical toxicology testing of biopharmaceuticals differ from the paradigms used for small molecules and often need to be defined on a case-by-case basis, primarily taking into consideration species cross-reactivity attributes of the molecule of interest. Certain studies required for small molecules are not applicable to most biopharmaceuticals (i.e. genotoxicity testing, testing for interactions with the hERG channel). This manuscript provides an overview of both the quality and nonclinical toxicology testing for these mammalian-cell-derived products, two elements pivotal to the overall nonclinical assessment of the safety of these biopharmaceutical products.
生物制药在治疗未满足的医疗需求方面取得了重大进展,越来越多的传统制药公司将生物技术能力纳入其产品组合。小分子和生物制药的总体安全测试范式存在一些差异,这些安全测试包括质量和毒理学方面。这些差异与所涉及的制造过程和分子本身有关。例如,对于生物制药,活细胞代表合成复杂分子实体的工厂。因此,这类药物的安全性测试包括通常不需要用于小分子的意外试剂测试(例如病毒、支原体、传染性海绵状脑病试剂)。此外,生物制药的非临床毒理学测试策略与小分子使用的范式不同,通常需要根据具体情况进行定义,主要考虑到感兴趣分子的物种交叉反应属性。某些适用于小分子的研究不适用于大多数生物制药(即遗传毒性测试、与 hERG 通道相互作用的测试)。本文概述了这些哺乳动物细胞衍生产品的质量和非临床毒理学测试,这两个要素是对这些生物制药产品整体非临床安全性评估的关键。