Suppr超能文献

预备性家庭漂白对自酸蚀黏结剂微渗漏的影响。

Effect of prerestorative home-bleaching on microleakage of self-etch adhesives.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010 Jun;22(3):186-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00335.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tooth bleaching has become a routine treatment due to patients' esthetic demands.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate how prerestorative home-bleaching affected microleakage of resin composite restorations bonded with etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty extracted human premolar teeth were used. The bleaching agent (10% carbamide peroxide) was applied to the buccal surface of each tooth for 6 hours a day for 2 weeks. The lingual surfaces of the same teeth received no application (control). The teeth were stored in artificial saliva. After 14 days, standardized Class V cavity preparations (2 mm high, 3 mm wide, and 2 mm deep) were made on the buccal and lingual surfaces with all margins in the enamel. They were randomly divided into five groups according to the adhesive systems: an etch-and-rinse adhesive (Single Bond [SB]), two two-step self-etch adhesives (Adper SE Plus [ASE] and One Coat [OC]), and two one-step self-etch adhesives (Adper Easy One [EO] and G-Bond [GB]). All adhesives were applied according to the manufacturers' instructions. The preparations were then restored using the same hybrid composite (Filtek Z250) in one increment and light-cured. The teeth were thermocycled (5/55 degrees C, 1,000x) and immersed in dye, then sectioned, and dye penetration was scored. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests.

RESULTS

Although statistically significant differences were found between the adhesive systems in the bleached teeth, no differences were observed in the control groups (non-bleached teeth). There were significant differences between SB/GB, SB/EO, SB/OC, and GB/ASE in the bleached teeth (p < 0.05). When comparing bleached and non-bleached teeth within each adhesive system, only SB and EO produced higher leakage scores when bleaching was applied. The other groups showed no difference in terms of bleaching (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Prerestorative home-bleaching had an adverse effect on microleakage of SB and EO.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The effect of prerestorative home-bleaching agents on microleakage of composite resin restorations differs according to the type of adhesive material used.

摘要

背景

由于患者的审美需求,牙齿漂白已成为常规治疗。

目的

本研究旨在评估修复前家庭漂白对使用酸蚀-冲洗和自酸蚀黏结剂黏结的树脂复合材料修复体微渗漏的影响。

材料和方法

使用 50 颗人离体前磨牙。每天将漂白剂(10%过氧化脲)应用于每个牙齿的颊面 6 小时,持续 2 周。同一牙齿的舌面不进行应用(对照)。牙齿保存在人工唾液中。14 天后,在颊面和舌面制备标准化的 V 类洞型预备(高 2mm、宽 3mm、深 2mm),所有边缘均位于釉质内。根据黏结系统将牙齿随机分为五组:一种酸蚀-冲洗黏结剂(Single Bond [SB])、两种两步自酸蚀黏结剂(Adper SE Plus [ASE]和 One Coat [OC])和两种一步自酸蚀黏结剂(Adper Easy One [EO]和 G-Bond [GB])。所有黏结剂均按照制造商的说明使用。然后使用相同的混合复合树脂(Filtek Z250)一次性进行修复并光照固化。牙齿经过热循环(5/55 度 C,1000x)和染料浸泡后,进行切片,评分染料渗透。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验对数据进行分析。

结果

尽管在漂白牙齿的黏结系统之间观察到统计学上的显著差异,但在对照组(未漂白牙齿)中未观察到差异。在漂白牙齿中,SB/GB、SB/EO、SB/OC 和 GB/ASE 之间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。在每个黏结系统内比较漂白和未漂白牙齿时,仅 SB 和 EO 在应用漂白时产生更高的泄漏评分。其他组在漂白方面没有差异(p>0.05)。

结论

修复前家庭漂白对 SB 和 EO 的微渗漏有不利影响。

临床意义

修复前家庭漂白剂对复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响因所用黏结材料的类型而异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验