Division of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(9):565-79. doi: 10.2165/11533450-000000000-00000.
BACKGROUND: Three fixed maintenance-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta(2)-agonist (ICS/LABA) combinations for the treatment of asthma are currently available: salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (Seretide/Advair/Adoair) budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) and beclometasone/formoterol (Foster). All of these combinations have proven efficacy in terms of controlling symptoms, improving lung function and reducing the rate of exacerbations compared with ICSs and LABAs administered separately. Budesonide/formoterol is also approved for use as maintenance and reliever therapy in a number of countries (Symbicort SMART). Many of the studies supporting the use of budesonide/formoterol combination therapies have included populations of adolescents and adults aged >11 years. OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis compared the efficacy of ICS/LABA fixed maintenance-dose treatment with budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy in patients with persistent asthma aged > or =16 years. METHODS: Following 2-weeks' run-in, 2866 adults aged > or =16 years were randomized to: fixed maintenance-dose budesonide/formoterol 640 microg/18 microg per day, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 100 microg/500 microg per day plus terbutaline as needed, or budesonide/formoterol 320 microg/9 microg per day plus additional inhalations as needed (budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy). Outcome measures included time to first severe asthma exacerbation (primary outcome) and number of severe asthma exacerbations. RESULTS: Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy prolonged time to first severe exacerbation versus budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone propionate fixed maintenance dose (p = 0.037 and p = 0.0089, respectively). Compared with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate fixed maintenance-dose treatment, fixed maintenance-dose budesonide/formoterol reduced the risk of hospitalizations/emergency-room visits by 28% (relative rate [RR] 0.72; 95% CI 0.53, 0.98; p = 0.034) and budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy by 37% (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.46, 0.87; p = 0.0043). All treatments provided similar improvements in lung function, asthma control days and asthma-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide/formoterol fixed maintenance dose or maintenance and reliever therapy provides similar improvements in current asthma control and reduces the future risk of hospitalizations/emergency-room treatments versus salmeterol/fluticasone propionate fixed maintenance-dose treatment, providing additional clinical benefit to asthma patients aged > or =16 years.
背景:目前有三种固定剂量的吸入性皮质类固醇/长效β2 激动剂(ICS/LABA)联合制剂用于治疗哮喘:沙美特罗/氟替卡松丙酸酯(Seretide/Advair/Adoair)、布地奈德/福莫特罗(Symbicort)和倍氯米松/福莫特罗(Foster)。与单独使用 ICS 和 LABA 相比,所有这些联合制剂在控制症状、改善肺功能和减少恶化率方面均具有疗效。布地奈德/福莫特罗也被批准用于许多国家(Symbicort SMART)的维持和缓解治疗。支持使用布地奈德/福莫特罗联合治疗的许多研究都包括年龄>11 岁的青少年和成年人。
目的:本事后分析比较了 ICS/LABA 固定维持剂量治疗与布地奈德/福莫特罗和沙美特罗/氟替卡松丙酸酯与布地奈德/福莫特罗维持和缓解治疗在年龄>或=16 岁的持续性哮喘患者中的疗效。
方法:在 2 周的导入期后,2866 名年龄>或=16 岁的成年人被随机分配到:布地奈德/福莫特罗 640 微克/18 微克/天、沙美特罗/氟替卡松丙酸酯 100 微克/500 微克/天加按需使用特布他林,或布地奈德/福莫特罗 320 微克/9 微克/天加按需使用额外的吸入剂(布地奈德/福莫特罗维持和缓解治疗)。主要终点是首次严重哮喘恶化的时间,次要终点包括严重哮喘恶化的次数。
结果:与布地奈德/福莫特罗和沙美特罗/氟替卡松丙酸酯固定维持剂量治疗相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗维持和缓解治疗延长了首次严重哮喘恶化的时间(p=0.037 和 p=0.0089)。与沙美特罗/氟替卡松丙酸酯固定维持剂量治疗相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗固定维持剂量治疗降低了住院/急诊治疗的风险 28%(相对风险 [RR] 0.72;95%CI 0.53,0.98;p=0.034),布地奈德/福莫特罗维持和缓解治疗降低了 37%(RR 0.63;95%CI 0.46,0.87;p=0.0043)。所有治疗均提供了相似的肺功能改善、哮喘控制天数和哮喘相关生活质量改善。
结论:布地奈德/福莫特罗固定维持剂量或维持和缓解治疗与沙美特罗/氟替卡松丙酸酯固定维持剂量治疗相比,在当前哮喘控制方面提供了相似的改善,并降低了未来住院/急诊治疗的风险,为年龄>或=16 岁的哮喘患者提供了额外的临床获益。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2016-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-5-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011-12-7
Respir Med. 2009-10-8
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009-10-15
Int J Clin Pract. 2007-5
Eur Respir J. 2007-3