Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;52(4):843-9, 849.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.04.057.
To provide a solid baseline reference for quality of life (QoL) in patients with no-option critical limb ischemia (CLI). CLI is associated with surgery, endovascular interventions, hospitalization, and a poor prognosis. An increasing number of clinical trials are, therefore, investigating new treatment strategies (eg, therapeutic neovascularization) in patients with CLI. QoL serves as an important secondary endpoint in many of these trials, but solid reference QoL data for patients with no-option CLI are lacking.
The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaires were used to obtain baseline QoL scores from 47 patients with no-option CLI participating in a therapeutic neovascularization trial. To allow for easy comparability, a norm-based scoring (NBS) method was used to report the results of the SF-36. Scores of patients with CLI were furthermore compared with scores of patients with milder forms of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and with patients with cardiovascular risk factors only. Determinants of QoL in patients with PAD were identified using multiple linear regression methods.
Patients with no-option CLI reported QoL scores below the general population mean on every health dimension of the SF-36. Physical functioning, role physical functioning, and bodily pain were affected most intensively. These poor physical QoL scores were further underlined when compared with other patients with milder forms of PAD or patients with cardiovascular risk factors only. Patients with CLI scored poorly on the pain/discomfort and the usual activities domain of the EQ-5D. Diabetes, female gender, body mass index, and the ankle-brachial index at rest were significant determinants of the QoL in PAD on multivariate analysis.
The QoL data of patients with no-option CLI using NBS methods for the SF-36 provide a baseline reference for ongoing clinical trials on new treatment strategies. Our data stress the need for new revascularization therapies in patients with no-option CLI.
为无选择重症肢体缺血(CLI)患者的生活质量(QoL)提供坚实的基线参考。CLI 与手术、血管内介入、住院和预后不良有关。因此,越来越多的临床试验正在研究 CLI 患者的新治疗策略(例如治疗性新生血管形成)。QoL 是这些试验中的一个重要次要终点,但缺乏无选择 CLI 患者的可靠 QoL 数据。
使用医疗结局研究短表单 36 项(SF-36)和欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)问卷,从参加治疗性新生血管形成试验的 47 名无选择 CLI 患者中获得基线 QoL 评分。为了便于比较,使用基于标准的评分(NBS)方法报告 SF-36 的结果。CLI 患者的评分还与病情较轻的外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者和仅患有心血管危险因素的患者进行了比较。使用多元线性回归方法确定 PAD 患者 QoL 的决定因素。
无选择 CLI 患者在 SF-36 的每个健康维度上的 QoL 评分均低于一般人群平均值。身体机能、身体角色机能和身体疼痛受到的影响最为严重。与病情较轻的 PAD 患者或仅患有心血管危险因素的患者相比,这些较差的身体 QoL 评分进一步凸显了这一点。CLI 患者在 EQ-5D 的疼痛/不适和日常活动领域的评分较差。糖尿病、女性、体重指数和静息时踝肱指数是 PAD 患者 QoL 的多变量分析中的显著决定因素。
使用 SF-36 的 NBS 方法为正在进行的新治疗策略临床试验提供了无选择 CLI 患者的 QoL 数据基线参考。我们的数据强调了需要为无选择 CLI 患者提供新的血运重建治疗。