Department of Neurological Sciences, University "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy Department of Neurological Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy National Centre for Epidemiology, Surveillance, and Health Promotion, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Haematology, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy Department of Medical Clinics and Therapy, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Pain. 2010 Sep;150(3):516-521. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
In patients with distal symmetric polyneuropathy we assessed non-nociceptive Abeta- and nociceptive Adelta-afferents to investigate their role in the development of neuropathic pain. We screened 2240 consecutive patients with sensory disturbances and collected 150 patients with distal symmetric polyneuropathy (68 with pain and 82 without). All patients underwent the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory to rate ongoing, paroxysmal and provoked pains, a standard nerve conduction study (NCS) to assess Abeta-fibre function, and laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) to assess Adelta-fibre function. Patients with pain had the same age (P>0.50), but a longer delay since symptom onset than those without (P<0.01). Whereas the LEP amplitude was significantly lower in patients with pain than in those without (P<0.0001), NCS data did not differ between groups (P>0.50). LEPs were more severely affected in patients with ongoing pain than in those with provoked pain (P<0.0001). Our findings indicate that the impairment of Abeta-fibres has no role in the development of ongoing or provoked pain. In patients with ongoing pain the severe LEP suppression and the correlation between pain intensity and LEP attenuation may indicate that this type of pain reflects damage to nociceptive axons. The partially preserved LEPs in patients with provoked pain suggest that this type of pain is related to the abnormal activity arising from partially spared and sensitised nociceptive terminals. Because clinical and neurophysiological abnormalities followed similar patterns regardless of aetiology, pain should be classified and treated on mechanism-based grounds.
在患有远端对称性多发性神经病的患者中,我们评估了非伤害性 Abeta 和伤害性 Adelta 传入纤维,以研究它们在神经性疼痛发展中的作用。我们筛选了 2240 例有感觉障碍的连续患者,并收集了 150 例远端对称性多发性神经病患者(68 例有疼痛,82 例无疼痛)。所有患者均接受神经性疼痛症状量表评估持续性、阵发性和诱发性疼痛,标准神经传导研究(NCS)评估 Abeta 纤维功能,以及激光诱发电位(LEP)评估 Adelta 纤维功能。有疼痛的患者年龄相同(P>0.50),但自症状出现以来的延迟时间长于无疼痛的患者(P<0.01)。虽然有疼痛的患者的 LEP 振幅明显低于无疼痛的患者(P<0.0001),但两组之间的 NCS 数据无差异(P>0.50)。持续性疼痛患者的 LEP 受影响更为严重,而诱发性疼痛患者的 LEP 受影响较轻(P<0.0001)。我们的研究结果表明,Abeta 纤维的损伤在持续性或诱发性疼痛的发展中不起作用。在持续性疼痛患者中,LEP 严重抑制以及疼痛强度与 LEP 衰减之间的相关性可能表明这种类型的疼痛反映了伤害性轴突的损伤。在诱发性疼痛患者中部分保留的 LEP 提示这种类型的疼痛与部分保留和致敏的伤害性末梢异常活动有关。由于临床和神经生理学异常无论病因如何都遵循相似的模式,疼痛应基于机制进行分类和治疗。