Suppr超能文献

客观疼痛诊断学:临床神经生理学。

Objective pain diagnostics: clinical neurophysiology.

机构信息

Inserm U1028, Central Integration of Pain Unit, Centre for Neuroscience of Lyon, University Claude-Bernard Lyon, University Hospital Pain Center, Neurological Hospital, 69003 Lyon, France.

出版信息

Neurophysiol Clin. 2012 Jun;42(4):187-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

Abstract

Neurophysiological techniques help in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of chronic pain, and are particularly useful to determine its neuropathic origin. According to current standards, the diagnosis of definite neuropathic pain (NP) needs objective confirmation of a lesion or disease of somatosensory systems, which can be provided by neurophysiological testing. Lesions causing NP mostly concern the pain-temperature pathways, and therefore neurophysiological procedures allowing the specific testing of these pathways (i.e., A-delta and C-fibres, spino-thalamo-cortical tracts) are essential for objective diagnosis. Different techniques to stimulate selectively pain-temperature pathways are discussed. Of these, laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) appear as the easiest and most reliable neurophysiological method of assessing nociceptive function, and their coupling with autonomic responses (e.g., galvanic skin response) and psychophysics (quantitative sensory testing - QST) can still enhance their diagnostic yield. Neurophysiological techniques not exploring specifically nociception, such as standard nerve conduction velocities (NCV) and SEPs to non-noxious stimulation, should be associated to the exploration of nociceptive systems, not only because both may be simultaneously affected to different degrees, but also because some specific painful symptoms, such as paroxysmal discharges, may depend on specific alteration of highly myelinated A-beta fibres. The choice of techniques is determined after anamnesis and clinical exam, and tries to answer a number of questions: (a) is the pain-related to injury of somatosensory pathways?; (b) to what extent are different subsystems affected?; (c) are mechanisms and lesion site in accordance with imaging data?; (d) are results of use for diagnostic or therapeutic follow-up? Neuropathic pain (NP) affects more than 15 million people in Western countries, and its belated diagnosis leads to insufficient or delayed therapy. The use of neurofunctional approaches to obtain a "physiological photograph" of somatosensory function is therefore highly relevant, as it yields significant clues about the type and mechanisms of pain, thus prompting rapid and optimised therapy.

摘要

神经生理学技术有助于慢性疼痛的诊断、预后和治疗,特别有助于确定其神经病理性起源。根据当前标准,明确的神经病理性疼痛 (NP) 的诊断需要躯体感觉系统损伤或疾病的客观确认,这可以通过神经生理学测试提供。引起 NP 的损伤主要涉及疼痛-温度通路,因此允许对这些通路进行特定测试的神经生理学程序(即 A-δ和 C 纤维、脊髓-丘脑-皮质束)对于客观诊断至关重要。讨论了用于选择性刺激疼痛-温度通路的不同技术。其中,激光诱发电位 (LEP) 似乎是评估伤害感受功能的最简单、最可靠的神经生理学方法,其与自主反应(例如,皮肤电反应)和心理物理学(定量感觉测试-QST)的结合仍然可以提高其诊断效果。不专门探索伤害感受的神经生理学技术,例如标准神经传导速度 (NCV) 和非伤害性刺激的 SEP,应与伤害感受系统的探索相关联,不仅因为两者可能同时受到不同程度的影响,而且还因为一些特定的疼痛症状,例如阵发性放电,可能取决于高度髓鞘化的 A-β纤维的特定改变。技术的选择取决于病史和临床检查,并试图回答以下几个问题:(a) 疼痛是否与躯体感觉通路的损伤有关?;(b) 不同子系统受到多大程度的影响?;(c) 机制和损伤部位与影像学数据相符吗?;(d) 结果是否用于诊断或治疗随访?在西方国家,有超过 1500 万人患有神经病理性疼痛 (NP),其诊断延误导致治疗不足或延迟。因此,使用神经功能方法获得躯体感觉功能的“生理照片”非常重要,因为它可以提供有关疼痛类型和机制的重要线索,从而促使快速和优化的治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验