Balci Fuat, Ludvig Elliot A, Brunner Dani
Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Behav Processes. 2010 Oct;85(2):204-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.06.012. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
The peak procedure is widely used in the study of interval timing with animals. Multiple timing measures can be derived from peak responding. These measures are typically presented as averages across many trials based on the implicit assumption that peak responding is stable throughout the session. We tested this assumption by examining whether peak responding changed over the course of the session in 45 mice that were trained on a fixed-interval 30-s schedule. All common measures of peak responding, except stop times, changed over the course of the session: start times increased, response rates and spreads decreased, and, although less reliably, peak times also shifted rightward. These results are congruent with a motivational interpretation, whereby increased satiety leads to the observed behavioral signature of within-session modulation of timed anticipatory responding.
峰值程序在动物间隔计时研究中被广泛使用。多种计时测量可以从峰值反应中得出。这些测量通常以许多试验的平均值呈现,基于峰值反应在整个实验过程中是稳定的这一隐含假设。我们通过检查在固定间隔30秒时间表上训练的45只小鼠的峰值反应在实验过程中是否发生变化来测试这一假设。除了停止时间外,所有常见的峰值反应测量在实验过程中都发生了变化:开始时间增加,反应率和分布范围减小,并且,尽管不太可靠,峰值时间也向右移动。这些结果与一种动机性解释一致,即饱腹感增加导致了在实验过程中定时预期反应的内部调节所观察到的行为特征。