Okin P M, Bergman G, Kligfield P
Department of Medicine, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, N.Y. 10021.
Circulation. 1991 Jul;84(1):57-66. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.84.1.57.
Recent reports critical of the performance of heart rate-adjusted indexes of ST depression during exercise electrocardiography have used J-point rather than ST segment measurements. However, no standard exists for the optimal time after the J-point at which to measure ST segment deviation.
To assess the effect of ST segment measurement position on performance of standard exercise electrocardiographic criteria, the delta ST segment/heart rate (delta ST/HR) index, and the ST segment/heart rate (ST/HR) slope for the detection of coronary artery disease, the exercise electrocardiograms of 50 clinically normal subjects and 80 patients with known or likely coronary disease were analyzed using ST depression measured at both the J-point and at 60 msec after the J-point (J + 60). A positive exercise electrocardiogram by standard criteria, defined as 0.1 mV or more of additional horizontal or downsloping ST depression at end exercise, had a specificity of 96% when ST depression was measured at either the J-point or J + 60. There was no difference in sensitivity of standard electrocardiographic criteria at J + 60 and J point (both 59%, p = NS). However, at matched specificity of 96%, the delta ST/HR index and ST/HR slope calculated using ST depression at J + 60 were significantly more sensitive (90% and 93%) than when calculated using J-point depression (64% and 61%, each p less than 0.001). Comparison of areas under respective receiver operating characteristic curves confirmed the superior performance of J + 60 as opposed to J-point measurements for both the delta ST/HR index (0.98 versus 0.89, p = 0.006) and the ST/HR slope (0.96 versus 0.87, p = 0.007) and also demonstrated modestly improved overall test performance for standard electrocardiographic criteria using J + 60 measurements (0.88 versus 0.82, p = 0.001).
Use of J-point measurements significantly degrades performance of heart rate-adjusted indexes of ST depression but has less effect on standard criteria.
近期有关运动心电图期间ST段压低的心率校正指标表现的批评性报告使用的是J点而非ST段测量值。然而,对于在J点之后测量ST段偏移的最佳时间,尚无标准。
为评估ST段测量位置对标准运动心电图标准、δST段/心率(δST/HR)指数以及用于检测冠状动脉疾病的ST段/心率(ST/HR)斜率的影响,对50名临床正常受试者和80名已知或可能患有冠状动脉疾病的患者的运动心电图进行分析,使用在J点以及J点后60毫秒(J+60)处测量的ST段压低情况进行分析。按照标准标准,运动心电图阳性定义为运动结束时额外的水平或下斜ST段压低0.1mV或更多,当在J点或J+60处测量ST段压低时,其特异性为96%。J+60和J点处标准心电图标准的敏感性无差异(均为59%,p=无显著性差异)。然而,在匹配的96%特异性下,使用J+60处ST段压低计算的δST/HR指数和ST/HR斜率比使用J点压低计算时显著更敏感(分别为90%和93%)(p均小于0.001)。对各自的受试者工作特征曲线下面积进行比较证实,对于δST/HR指数(0.98对0.89,p=0.006)和ST/HR斜率(0.96对0.87,p=0.007),J+60测量相对于J点测量具有更优的表现,并且还表明使用J+60测量时标准心电图标准的总体测试表现略有改善(0.88对0.82,p=0.001)。
使用J点测量会显著降低ST段压低的心率校正指标的表现,但对标准标准的影响较小。