Suppr超能文献

一家三级护理医院中艰难梭菌相关性腹泻(CDAD)的假性暴发。

Pseudo-outbreak of Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) in a tertiary-care hospital.

作者信息

Souza Dias M Beatriz, Yamashiro Juliana, Borrasca Vera L, Stempliuk Valeska A, Araújo Maria Rita E, Costa Silvia F, Levin Anna S

机构信息

Infection Control Unit, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2010 May-Jun;52(3):133-7. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652010000300004.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe a pseudo-outbreak of C. difficile in a hospital, following a change in the method used to detect the toxin. In February 2002, there were two cases of CDAD and in March 7 occurred, coinciding with a change of the test (from detection of toxin A to toxin A/B). An outbreak was suspected. Active surveillance and education of staff were started. A CDAD case was defined as a patient with acute onset of diarrhea (> or = three episodes of liquid stools) and a positive stool test. They were classified as hospital or community-acquired. Stool samples were also collected for C. difficile culture and isolates were typed using AP-PCR. From March 2002 through December 2003 there were 138 cases of CDAD: 70% were hospital-acquired and among the 30% with CDAD present on admission, most (81%) came directly from the community (50% had no history of hospitalization). Fifty-two percent of hospital-acquired CDAD and 94% of cases on admission had already used antibiotics. The incidence of CDAD in hospitalized patients during surveillance was 3.3 per 1000 patient-admissions. The incidence of CDAD present on admission was 6.1/1000 patients. Sixteen isolates were typed and presented 13 different profiles. In conclusion, the CDAD increase in our study occurred due to change in diagnostic methods and not due to an outbreak, as suspected initially. The incidence in hospitalized patients was much lower than in reported outbreaks. There were 13 molecular types suggesting that an outbreak did not occur. CDAD was largely community-acquired.

摘要

本研究的目的是描述一家医院在检测毒素的方法发生改变后艰难梭菌的假性暴发情况。2002年2月,出现了2例艰难梭菌相关性腹泻(CDAD)病例,3月有7例,这与检测方法的改变(从毒素A检测改为毒素A/B检测)相吻合。怀疑发生了暴发。于是启动了主动监测并对工作人员进行教育。CDAD病例定义为腹泻急性发作(≥3次稀便)且粪便检测呈阳性的患者。这些病例被分为医院获得性或社区获得性。还采集粪便样本进行艰难梭菌培养,并使用扩增片段长度多态性聚合酶链反应(AP-PCR)对分离株进行分型。从2002年3月到2003年12月,共出现138例CDAD病例:70%为医院获得性,在入院时就存在CDAD的病例中,大多数(81%)直接来自社区(50%无住院史)。医院获得性CDAD病例中有52%以及入院时就存在CDAD的病例中有94%此前已使用过抗生素。监测期间住院患者中CDAD的发病率为每1000例患者入院3.3例。入院时就存在CDAD的发病率为每1000例患者6.1例。对16株分离株进行了分型,呈现出13种不同的图谱。总之,我们研究中CDAD病例数的增加是由于诊断方法的改变,而非如最初怀疑的那样是暴发所致。住院患者中的发病率远低于已报告的暴发情况。有13种分子类型,表明未发生暴发。CDAD很大程度上是社区获得性的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验