Institute of Chemistry Department of Analytical Chemistry, L. Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary.
Talanta. 2010 Jul 15;82(2):600-7. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.05.014. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
In this paper authors describe a GC-MS acquisition study, relating to the most common, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as ibuprofen, naproxen, ketoprofen and diclofenac. As novelties to the field, for the trimethylsilyl (TMS) oxime ester derivatives of NSAIDs, at first, a tandem mass spectrometric (MS/MS) acquisition method has been developed, and, also for the first time, the three acquisition techniques, the full scan (FS), the selective ion monitoring (SIM) and the currently optimized MS/MS ones, have been compared: all three in parallel, under strictly the same derivatization/instrumental conditions, both from model solutions and from the Danube River samples. Critical evaluation of the three acquisition protocols was collated on their analytical performances and validated with the same characteristics like the six point calibration curve, the relative standard deviation percentages (RSD%) of parallel tests, the limit of quantitation (LOQ) and the instrumental limit of quantitation (ILQ) values. Data of six point calibration (r(2)>or=0.997) and RSD% (average: 5.8 RSD%) values proved to be independent on the acquisition methods, while, LOQ and ILQ values furnished considerable differences. Decreasing LOQ data, (expressed in ng/L concentrations) were obtained in the FS, SIM, MS/MS line for ibuprofen (1.0, 0.43, 0.41), naproxen (1.1, 1.0, 0.42), ketoprofen (2.6, 1.0, 0.49) and diclofenac (1.4, 0.41, 0.21), respectively. The same trend was determined in terms of the ILQ values. The practical utility of the optimized MS/MS technique was confirmed by the quantitation of the NSAID contents of the Danube River samples, determined by all three acquisition techniques. Results obtained confirmed the primary importance of the MS/MS acquisition method, even in comparison to the SIM one: avoiding the extreme overestimation of the ibuprofen (approximately 100%) and ketoprofen (approximately 400%) concentrations in the Danube River samples.
本文作者描述了一项 GC-MS 采集研究,涉及最常见的非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs),如布洛芬、萘普生、酮洛芬和双氯芬酸。作为该领域的创新,首先为 NSAIDs 的三甲基硅基(TMS)肟酯衍生物开发了串联质谱(MS/MS)采集方法,并且首次比较了三种采集技术,即全扫描(FS)、选择离子监测(SIM)和目前优化的 MS/MS 技术:所有这三种技术都在完全相同的衍生化/仪器条件下平行进行,无论是从模型溶液还是从多瑙河河水样本中进行。通过相同的特征(如六点校准曲线、平行测试的相对标准偏差百分比(RSD%)、定量限(LOQ)和仪器定量限(ILQ)值)对三种采集方案进行了批判性评估。六点校准(r(2)>or=0.997)和 RSD%(平均值:5.8 RSD%)数据独立于采集方法,而 LOQ 和 ILQ 值则存在显著差异。在 FS、SIM 和 MS/MS 线上,布洛芬(1.0、0.43、0.41)、萘普生(1.1、1.0、0.42)、酮洛芬(2.6、1.0、0.49)和双氯芬酸(1.4、0.41、0.21)的 LOQ 值呈下降趋势。ILQ 值也呈现出相同的趋势。通过所有三种采集技术对多瑙河河水样本中 NSAID 含量进行定量,证实了优化后的 MS/MS 技术的实际应用价值。所获得的结果证实了 MS/MS 采集方法的首要重要性,甚至与 SIM 方法相比也是如此:避免了对多瑙河河水样本中布洛芬(约 100%)和酮洛芬(约 400%)浓度的极端高估。