• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜结直肠切除术后切口疝的发生率。

Incisional hernia rates following laparoscopic colorectal resection.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 4th Floor, Medical School Building, 74 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6AU, UK.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2010;8(6):470-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.06.008. Epub 2010 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.06.008
PMID:20603232
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In published series with satisfactory follow-up incisional hernia rates following laparotomy vary between 4 and 18%, with up to 75% developing within two years of operation. This therefore represents the commonest complication following open abdominal surgery and a substantial added workload for the colorectal/general surgeon.

AIM

To prospectively review incisional hernia rates in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection in a single centre.

METHODS

All laparoscopic wounds were closed in identical fashion to open closure technique, utilising 0-monofilament, polyglyconate and a mass closure technique, followed by a subcuticular, polyglactin-910 suture for skin closure. All patients were subsequently examined in an outpatient setting by a senior surgeon independent to the original procedure.

RESULTS

167 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections (94M:73F; median age 68 years) were included. Median incision length for specimen extraction was 6 cm (range 3-11 cm) and patients were followed-up for a median of 36 months (range 24-77 months). Twelve (7%) patients developed an incisional hernia (ten in specimen extraction wounds and two in port-site wounds), ten of whom underwent successful laparoscopic repairs. Of the remaining patients, one remains symptomatic and awaits repair, and one is asymptomatic and unfit for surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The well-documented advantages of laparoscopic surgery include reduced hospital stay, early return to activity, decreased analgesic requirements and improved cosmesis. However, the results of this study suggest that incisional hernia rates are not decreased by laparoscopic surgery, although the hernias may be smaller and more amenable to repair by laparoscopic approaches.

摘要

引言

在发表的系列研究中,剖腹手术后的切口疝发生率在 4%至 18%之间,有高达 75%的切口疝在手术后两年内发生。因此,这是开放腹部手术后最常见的并发症,也是结直肠/普通外科医生的一项重要额外工作。

目的

前瞻性地回顾单中心行腹腔镜结直肠切除术患者的切口疝发生率。

方法

所有腹腔镜切口均采用与开放切口相同的闭合技术进行闭合,使用 0 单丝、聚甘醇酸和质量闭合技术,然后使用皮下聚乳酸-910 缝线进行皮肤闭合。所有患者随后由与原始手术无关的资深外科医生在门诊进行检查。

结果

共纳入 167 例连续行腹腔镜结直肠切除术的患者(94 例男性:73 例女性;中位年龄 68 岁)。标本取出的切口长度中位数为 6 厘米(范围 3-11 厘米),患者中位随访时间为 36 个月(范围 24-77 个月)。12 例(7%)患者发生切口疝(10 例发生在标本取出切口,2 例发生在端口部位切口),其中 10 例成功进行了腹腔镜修复。其余患者中,1 例仍有症状且需要修复,1 例无症状但不适合手术。

结论

腹腔镜手术的优势已得到充分证实,包括住院时间缩短、早期恢复活动、减少镇痛需求和改善美容效果。然而,本研究结果表明,腹腔镜手术并不能降低切口疝的发生率,尽管疝可能较小,更适合通过腹腔镜方法进行修复。

相似文献

1
Incisional hernia rates following laparoscopic colorectal resection.腹腔镜结直肠切除术后切口疝的发生率。
Int J Surg. 2010;8(6):470-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.06.008. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
2
Does the extraction-site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates?腹腔镜结直肠手术中提取部位的位置会对切口疝发生率产生影响吗?
Surg Endosc. 2008 Dec;22(12):2596-600. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9845-8. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
3
The influence of laparoscopy on incisional hernia rates: a retrospective analysis of 1057 colorectal cancer resections.腹腔镜检查对切口疝发生率的影响:对1057例结直肠癌切除术的回顾性分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Oct;16(10):815-21. doi: 10.1111/codi.12687.
4
Laparoscopic colorectal resection does not reduce incisional hernia rates when compared with open colorectal resection.与开放性结直肠切除术相比,腹腔镜结直肠切除术并不会降低切口疝的发生率。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):689-92. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9462-y.
5
Incidence and risk factors for the development of incisional hernia following elective laparoscopic versus open colon resections.择期腹腔镜与开腹结肠切除术后切口疝发生的发生率及危险因素。
Am J Surg. 2010 Aug;200(2):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.044. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
6
Hernia incidence following single-site vs standard laparoscopic colorectal surgery.单孔与标准腹腔镜结直肠手术后的疝发生率
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Mar;17(3):250-6. doi: 10.1111/codi.12797.
7
High incidence of symptomatic incisional hernia after midline extraction in laparoscopic colon resection.腹腔镜结肠切除术后经中线取出时,症状性切口疝的发生率较高。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Nov;26(11):3180-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2311-7. Epub 2012 May 12.
8
Does transumbilical incision increase incisional hernia at the extraction site of laparoscopic anterior resection?经脐切口会增加腹腔镜前切除术取出部位的切口疝发生率吗?
Am J Surg. 2015 Jun;209(6):1048-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.06.023. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
9
Laparoscopic IPAA is not associated with decreased rates of incisional hernia and small-bowel obstruction when compared with open technique: long-term follow-up of a case-matched study.与开放手术相比,腹腔镜回肠储袋肛管吻合术(IPAA)并不会降低切口疝和小肠梗阻的发生率:一项病例匹配研究的长期随访
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Mar;58(3):314-20. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000287.
10
Incidence of Incisional Hernia Repair After Laparoscopic Compared to Open Resection of Colonic Cancer: A Nationwide Analysis of 17,717 Patients.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌切除术术后切口疝修补的发生率:一项全国范围内 17717 例患者的分析。
World J Surg. 2020 May;44(5):1627-1636. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05375-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of safety and effectiveness between natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional transabdominal specimen extraction in robot-assisted colorectal cancer resection through systematic review and meta-analysis.通过系统评价和荟萃分析比较机器人辅助结直肠癌切除术中经自然腔道标本取出术与传统经腹标本取出术的安全性和有效性。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Oct 3;18(1):360. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02106-2.
2
Significance of Specimen Extraction Site in Minimizing Hernia Risk After Distal Pancreatectomy.标本提取部位对于降低远端胰腺切除术后疝风险的意义。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;31(13):8688-8698. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16096-w. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
3
Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus robotic transabdominal specimen extraction surgery for early-stage rectal cancer: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis (in China).
机器人经自然腔道标本取出术与机器人经腹腔标本取出术治疗早期直肠癌的多中心倾向评分匹配分析(中国)。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4521-4530. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10995-5. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
4
Increased risk of incisional hernia after stoma closure in patients with colorectal cancer.结直肠癌患者造口关闭术后切口疝风险增加。
Surg Today. 2024 Nov;54(11):1337-1344. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02866-2. Epub 2024 May 8.
5
Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction surgery for right colon cancer: A propensity matching study.经阴道与经腹右结肠癌标本提取手术:一项倾向匹配研究。
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 6;13:1168961. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1168961. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparison of transabdominal wall specimen retrieval and natural orifice specimen extraction robotic surgery in the outcome of colorectal cancer treatment.经腹壁标本取出与经自然腔道标本提取机器人手术在结直肠癌治疗结局中的比较。
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 16;10:1092128. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1092128. eCollection 2023.
7
Hughes abdominal closure versus standard mass closure to reduce incisional hernias following surgery for colorectal cancer: the HART RCT.Hughes 腹部关闭术与标准质量关闭术在减少结直肠癌手术后切口疝中的比较:HART RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Aug;26(34):1-100. doi: 10.3310/CMWC8368.
8
Risk factors of incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery with periumbilical minilaparotomy incision: a propensity score matching analysis.经脐小切口腹腔镜结直肠手术后切口疝的危险因素:倾向评分匹配分析
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Mar 15;25(1):24-31. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.1.24.
9
[Prophylaxis of parastomal, perineal and incisional hernias in colorectal surgery].[结直肠手术中造口旁疝、会阴疝和切口疝的预防]
Chirurg. 2021 Jul;92(7):621-629. doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01415-8. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
10
Short- and long-term outcomes for transvaginal specimen extraction versus minilaparotomy after robotic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: a mono-institution retrospective study.机器人辅助直肠癌前切除术后经阴道标本取出术与小切口剖腹术的短期和长期结局:一项单机构回顾性研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul 29;18(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01967-9.