University of Sheffield, UK.
Health (London). 2010 Jul;14(4):398-414. doi: 10.1177/1363459309358598.
Bakhtin's suggestion that a unified truth demands a 'multiplicity of consciousnesses' seems particularly relevant in the 'globally connected age'. At a time when the DIY/'punk ethic' seems to prevail online, and Wikipedia and blogging means that anyone with access to the Internet can enter into public deliberation, it is worth considering the potential for mass communication systems to create meaningful changes in the way that 'disability' is theorized. Based on the findings of qualitative research, this study explores competing interpretations of disability, specifically dialogue online over the meaning of Down's syndrome, from the vantage point of an approach towards language analysis that emanates from the work of the Bakhtin Circle. It will be shown that, suitably revised and supplemented, elements of Bakhtinian theory provide powerful tools for understanding online relations and changes in the notion of disability. It will also be shown that, while activists in the disabled people's movement have managed to effect modest changes to the way that disability is theorized, both online and in the 'real world', there remains a great deal still to be achieved. This study allows us to understand better the social struggles faced by disabled people and the opportunities open to them.
巴赫金提出,统一的真理需要“多种意识”,这在“全球互联时代”似乎尤为恰当。在 DIY/“朋克精神”似乎盛行于网络的时代,维基百科和博客意味着任何能够上网的人都可以参与公共讨论,因此值得考虑大众传播系统在残疾理论方面产生有意义变革的潜力。本研究基于定性研究的发现,从源自巴赫金圈子作品的语言分析方法的角度出发,探讨残疾的竞争解释,特别是对唐氏综合征含义的在线对话。研究表明,经过适当的修改和补充,巴赫金理论的要素为理解在线关系和残疾概念的变化提供了强有力的工具。同时还表明,尽管残疾人群体的活动家已经成功地在网络和“现实世界”中对残疾理论的方式进行了适度的改变,但仍有很多工作要做。本研究使我们能够更好地理解残疾人所面临的社会斗争以及他们所面临的机会。