Harman E, Hill M, Pieper J A, Hendeles L
Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Chest. 1991 Jul;100(1):17-22. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.1.17.
Methacholine challenges were performed in ten subjects with mild asthma at 2 h before and 20 min after placebo or 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 mg of inhaled verapamil given in a single-blind randomized crossover manner on different days. While verapamil did not have a bronchodilator effect, the 10-mg dose modestly increased the concentration of methacholine required to decrease FEV1 by 20 percent (PC20). The mean (+/- SEM) increase in PC20 from baseline was 2.1 +/- 0.2 times baseline after 10 mg of verapamil, compared to 1.1 +/- 0.1 times baseline after placebo (p less than 0.001). Unexpectedly, bronchoconstriction (greater than 10 percent decrease in FEV1) associated with cough or wheezing was observed in seven of ten subjects at doses of 20 mg or more. This adverse effect was not related to the osmolarity of the nebulized solutions. Thirty minutes before a standardized exercise challenge, 13 subjects inhaled placebo, 10 mg, or the highest dose of verapamil tolerated during the methacholine study (20 to 160 mg) in a double-blind randomized crossover manner. The exercise challenge was aborted in three subjects because of bronchospasm that occurred after administration of the higher dose. The mean (+/- SEM) maximum change in FEV1 after exercise in the ten subjects completing all three regimens of treatment was -17.1 +/- 4.0 percent after placebo, -12.7 +/- 4.3 percent after 10 mg (p less than 0.05), and -6.4 +/- 3.6 percent after the highest dose (p less than 0.05). We conclude that increasing the dose of verapamil above 10 mg did not provide greater benefit but, paradoxically, induced bronchoconstriction in most of the subjects. Because of this potential bronchoconstrictor effect, high doses of oral or intravenous verapamil should be used with caution in asthmatic subjects.
在10名轻度哮喘患者中进行了乙酰甲胆碱激发试验,分别于不同日期以单盲随机交叉方式在安慰剂或吸入5、10、20、40、80和160毫克维拉帕米前2小时及给药后20分钟进行。虽然维拉帕米没有支气管扩张作用,但10毫克剂量适度增加了使第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)降低20%所需的乙酰甲胆碱浓度(PC20)。与安慰剂后相比,10毫克维拉帕米后PC20从基线的平均(±标准误)增加为基线的2.1±0.2倍,而安慰剂后为1.1±0.1倍(p<0.001)。出乎意料的是,在10名受试者中有7名在20毫克或更高剂量时出现了与咳嗽或喘息相关的支气管收缩(FEV1降低超过10%)。这种不良反应与雾化溶液的渗透压无关。在标准化运动激发试验前30分钟,13名受试者以双盲随机交叉方式吸入安慰剂、10毫克或在乙酰甲胆碱研究中耐受的最高剂量维拉帕米(20至160毫克)。由于高剂量给药后发生支气管痉挛,3名受试者的运动激发试验中止。在完成所有三种治疗方案的10名受试者中,运动后FEV1的平均(±标准误)最大变化在安慰剂后为-17.1±4.0%,10毫克后为-12.7±4.3%(p<0.05),最高剂量后为-6.4±3.6%(p<0.05)。我们得出结论,将维拉帕米剂量增加到10毫克以上并没有带来更大益处,反而在大多数受试者中引发了支气管收缩。由于这种潜在的支气管收缩作用,哮喘患者应谨慎使用高剂量的口服或静脉维拉帕米。