• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调整评估生物标志物的测量误差。

Adjustment for the measurement error in evaluating biomarkers.

机构信息

Singapore Clinical Research Institute PTE Ltd., 31 Biopolis Way, Nanos #02-01, Singapore 138669, Singapore.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2010 Sep 30;29(22):2338-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.3993.

DOI:10.1002/sim.3993
PMID:20603813
Abstract

Biomarkers that can help identify patients who will have an early clinical benefit from a treatment are important not only for patients' survival and quality of life, but also for the cost of health care. Owing to reasons such as biological variation and limited machine precision, biomarkers are sometimes measured with large errors. Adjusting for the measurement error in calculating the proportion of the treatment effect explained by markers has been a subject of research. The proportion of information gain (PIG), a new quantity to measure the importance of a biomarker, has not yet been studied for variables measured with error. In this article, we provide methods to account for the measurement error in the calculation of PIG for continuous, binary and time-to-event outcomes. Simulation shows that the adjusted estimator has little bias and has less variability compared to the naive estimator ignoring the measurement error. Data from an osteoporosis clinical study are used to illustrate the method for a binary outcome.

摘要

能够帮助识别出哪些患者将从治疗中获得早期临床获益的生物标志物不仅对患者的生存和生活质量很重要,而且对医疗保健的成本也很重要。由于生物变异性和机器精度有限等原因,生物标志物的测量有时会存在较大误差。在计算标记物解释治疗效果的比例时,调整测量误差一直是研究的主题。尚未针对具有误差的变量研究新的信息量增益(PIG),这是一种用于衡量生物标志物重要性的新数量。在本文中,我们提供了一种方法来计算连续、二项和事件时间结果的 PIG 的测量误差。模拟结果表明,与忽略测量误差的简单估计器相比,调整后的估计器具有较小的偏差和较小的变异性。使用骨质疏松症临床研究的数据来说明二项结果的方法。

相似文献

1
Adjustment for the measurement error in evaluating biomarkers.调整评估生物标志物的测量误差。
Stat Med. 2010 Sep 30;29(22):2338-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.3993.
2
Quantifying the treatment effect explained by markers in the presence of measurement error.在存在测量误差的情况下,对由标志物解释的治疗效果进行量化。
Stat Med. 2007 Apr 30;26(9):1955-63. doi: 10.1002/sim.2695.
3
Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.使用多重填补缺失模式(MIMP)方法对缺失值进行倾向得分估计。
Stat Med. 2009 Apr 30;28(9):1402-14. doi: 10.1002/sim.3549.
4
Quantifying the indirect treatment effect via surrogate markers.通过替代标志物量化间接治疗效果。
Stat Med. 2006 Jan 30;25(2):223-31. doi: 10.1002/sim.2176.
5
Sensitivity in statistical evaluation of biomarkers.生物标志物统计评估的灵敏度。
Stat Med. 2013 Sep 20;32(21):3636-45. doi: 10.1002/sim.5794. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
6
Lasofoxifene: new drug. Osteoporosis: no better than raloxifene.拉索昔芬:新药。骨质疏松症:效果不比雷洛昔芬好。
Prescrire Int. 2009 Dec;18(104):247.
7
Skeletal effects of raloxifene after 8 years: results from the continuing outcomes relevant to Evista (CORE) study.雷洛昔芬治疗8年后对骨骼的影响:来自与Evista(依维斯他)相关的持续结果(CORE)研究的结果
J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Sep;20(9):1514-24. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050509. Epub 2005 May 16.
8
Health-economic comparison of three recommended drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis.三种推荐用于治疗骨质疏松症的药物的卫生经济学比较
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 2004;24(1):1-10.
9
[Raloxifene in clinical practice. Results of the non-interventional study CORAL (COmpliance with RALoxifene)].[临床实践中的雷洛昔芬。非干预性研究CORAL(雷洛昔芬依从性研究)的结果]
Vnitr Lek. 2008 Mar;54(3):217-9, 221-4.
10
Statistical validation of surrogate endpoints: is bone density a valid surrogate for fracture?替代终点的统计学验证:骨密度是骨折的有效替代指标吗?
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2004 Mar;4(1):64-74.

引用本文的文献

1
Surrogate Marker Evaluation: A Tutorial Using R.替代标志物评估:使用R语言的教程
Stat Med. 2025 May;44(10-12):e70048. doi: 10.1002/sim.70048.
2
Robust methods to correct for measurement error when evaluating a surrogate marker.稳健的方法来纠正替代标志物评估中的测量误差。
Biometrics. 2022 Mar;78(1):9-23. doi: 10.1111/biom.13386. Epub 2020 Oct 16.