Suppr超能文献

系统发生学能鉴定 C(4)起源和反转吗?

Can phylogenetics identify C(4) origins and reversals?

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

出版信息

Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jul;25(7):403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.04.007.

Abstract

Determining the direction of past transitions between adaptive traits is one of the major objectives of evolutionary biology. Insights can be gained from phylogenies, but violation of the assumptions of the statistical models used to reconstruct traits can result in severe biases and complementary evidence should be considered. Here, we review the weaknesses of relying solely on species phylogenies in reconstructing the evolutionary history of C(4) photosynthesis in grasses, a complex trait present in distinct phylogenetic groups. We argue that evolutionary transitions should be reconstructed by establishing the homology or convergence of the different states based on genetic and phenotypic analyses. Such an approach points to a predominance of C(4) gains over reversals to C(3) and we discuss potential explanations for this asymmetry in transition rates.

摘要

确定适应性特征过去转变方向是进化生物学的主要目标之一。从系统发育中可以获得一些见解,但如果违反了用于重建特征的统计模型的假设,则可能会导致严重的偏差,因此应该考虑补充证据。在这里,我们回顾了仅依靠物种系统发育重建禾本科植物 C(4)光合作用这一复杂特征进化历史的局限性,该特征存在于不同的系统发育群中。我们认为,应该通过基于遗传和表型分析来确定不同状态的同源性或趋同来重建进化转变。这种方法表明 C(4)获得的优势超过了向 C(3)的逆转,我们讨论了这种转变率不对称的潜在解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验