Suppr超能文献

普通外科住院医师内镜教育:满足新的 RRC 要求。

Endoscopy education in general surgery residencies: meeting the new RRC requirements.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2010 Oct;163(2):210-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.03.020. Epub 2010 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Residency Review Committee (RRC) for General Surgery recently increased the number of endoscopy cases required from 29 to 85. We sought to evaluate how programs were meeting these guidelines and what adaptations were occurring.

METHODS

Surveys were sent by regular mail and e-mail to program directors at accredited general surgery residencies.

RESULTS

Eighty-one of 250 surveys were returned (24%); 52% were university based; 100% of respondents were compliant with the old requirement, while 90% were compliant with the new RRC levels; 52% utilized a dedicated rotation and commonly in the private practices settings (75%). Virtually every program reported use of endoscopy suites (98%) or operating rooms (85%); fewer (64%) reported endoscopies in ICUs; 29% of programs had at least half of endoscopies taught by non-surgeons. The mean number of endoscopies performed was 160 (range 55-450), which exceeded the mean number of endoscopies (90) program directors believed were needed to gain privileges. The most commonly identified barriers to increasing endoscopy experience were work hour restrictions (38%) and referral patterns (42%).

CONCLUSIONS

Most programs responding to our survey are already compliant with the new RRC requirement. Much of this teaching occurs by non-surgeons and commonly away from the dominant teaching hospital. Future changes in endoscopy requirements should consider the impact of increasing nonsurgical teaching time. It seems likely that non-responding programs have even lower numbers than those responding and may have an even higher barrier to successfully increasing endoscopy education by surgeons.

摘要

背景

普通外科住院医师评审委员会(RRC)最近将内镜手术的要求数量从 29 例增加到 85 例。我们试图评估各项目是如何满足这些指南的,以及正在进行哪些调整。

方法

通过普通邮件和电子邮件向认证的普通外科住院医师项目主任发送调查。

结果

在 250 份调查中,有 81 份(24%)被退回;52%的调查对象来自大学附属医院;100%的受访者符合旧要求,而 90%的受访者符合新的 RRC 水平;52%的受访者利用专门的轮转制,通常在私人诊所进行(75%)。几乎每个项目都报告使用了内镜室(98%)或手术室(85%);较少的项目(64%)报告在 ICU 进行内镜检查;29%的项目中至少有一半的内镜检查由非外科医生教授。实施的内镜检查平均数量为 160 例(范围 55-450 例),超过了项目主任认为获得内镜检查权限所需的平均内镜检查数量(90 例)。增加内镜经验的最常见障碍是工作时间限制(38%)和转诊模式(42%)。

结论

对我们的调查做出回应的大多数项目已经符合新的 RRC 要求。大部分教学活动都是由非外科医生进行的,通常远离主导教学医院。未来内镜检查要求的变化应考虑到增加非手术教学时间的影响。没有回应的项目可能比做出回应的项目数量更少,而且外科医生成功增加内镜教育的障碍可能更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验