Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Postboks 4623, Nydalen, 0405 Oslo, Norway.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;19(11):845-53. doi: 10.1007/s00787-010-0120-x. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
Little is known about the contribution of attachment insecurity to Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), though speculations have been extensive. We aimed to study how states of mind (SoM) with regard to attachment relate to OCD with and without depressive disorder (DD). We interviewed 100 adolescents, 25 each with OCD, DD, OCD plus DD and general population controls, using the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) to assess attachment SoM. In the AAI, interviewees are asked about both generalized/semantic and biographical/episodic descriptions of childhood experience. Discourse styles are coded and classified by a blinded coder. While about half of the adolescents from the general population had secure SoM (52%), most adolescents in the clinical groups did not: OCD 12%; DD 8%; and DD + OCD 4% (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.0001). SoM with regard to attachment profiles differed significantly across the groups with 60% of participants with OCD classified as dismissing (Ds), 40% of the DD group as unresolved with regard to loss or abuse (U) and 28% as cannot classify, while 44 and 36%, respectively, of those with OCD + DD group were classified as either Ds or U (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.0001). Different kinds of SoM reflecting insecure attachment differentiated the clinical groups studied, with OCD predominantly showing dismissing traits and depression attachment SoM commonly associated with severe adverse events. Such differences might play distinct roles in the pathogenic processes of the psychiatric disorders, or be the result of the cognitive states associated with OCD and DD.
关于依恋不安全感对强迫症 (OCD) 的贡献知之甚少,尽管推测很多。我们旨在研究依恋的心态状态 (SoM) 如何与伴有和不伴有抑郁障碍 (DD) 的 OCD 相关。我们使用成人依恋访谈 (AAI) 采访了 100 名青少年,每组 25 名,分别患有 OCD、DD、OCD 加 DD 和普通人群对照,以评估依恋 SoM。在 AAI 中,受访者被要求提供有关童年经历的一般/语义和传记/事件描述。话语风格由一位盲目的编码员进行编码和分类。虽然大约一半的普通人群青少年有安全的 SoM(52%),但大多数临床组的青少年没有:OCD 12%;DD 8%;DD+OCD 4%(Fisher 精确检验,p=0.0001)。依恋配置文件的 SoM 在组间差异显著,60%的 OCD 参与者被归类为回避型(Ds),40%的 DD 组对损失或虐待未解决(U),28%无法归类,而 OCD+DD 组分别有 44%和 36%的参与者被归类为 Ds 或 U(Fisher 精确检验,p=0.0001)。反映不安全依恋的不同类型的 SoM 区分了研究的临床组,OCD 主要表现出回避特征,而抑郁依恋 SoM 通常与严重不良事件相关。这些差异可能在精神疾病的发病机制过程中发挥不同的作用,或者是与 OCD 和 DD 相关的认知状态的结果。