• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[不同充填材料封闭能力的比较评估]

[Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of different obturation materials].

作者信息

Melih Irena, Jakovljević Ankica, Popović Milica, Pesić Dragana

出版信息

Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2010 May-Jun;138(5-6):287-91. doi: 10.2298/sarh1006287m.

DOI:10.2298/sarh1006287m
PMID:20607969
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Root canal filling materials are intended to prevent microleakage and passing of microorganisms and their toxins along the root canal space and into the periradicular tissues.

OBJECTIVE

Objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare apical leakage of root canals obturated using a modified warm vertical condensation technique and different materials.

METHODS

Sixty-five extracted single-root teeth were prepared according to the crown-down/ step-back technique. Each canal was rinsed with 3% NaOCl during and after the preparation. The teeth were divided into 3 groups. Every group was obturated by the same technique, but with different materials: RealSeal system (SybronEndo), gutta-percha with AH Plus (Dentsply Maillefer) and gutta-percha with Acroseal sealer (Septodont). The remaining 20 teeth were in the control group. The teeth were immersed in 1% methylene blue for 72 hours. After that period, the roots were split longitudinally, and dye penetration was measured using a stereomicroscope.

RESULTS

Dye penetration occurred in all groups. The least dye penetration occurred in the RealSeal group (0.33 +/- 0.29 mm), while the highest dye penetration occurred in the Acroseal group (1.11 +/- 0.52 mm). According to the Student's t-test, Acroseal showed significantly more leakage (p < 0.001) than RealSeal and AH Plus materials. The microleakage of RealSeal system was not significantly different (p > 0.05) from that of AH Plus sealer with gutta-percha.

CONCLUSION

The results suggested that new material Resilon (RealSeal) and conventional combination AH Plus with guttapercha had the least apical dye penetration and provided the best sealing.

摘要

引言

根管充填材料旨在防止微渗漏以及微生物及其毒素沿根管间隙进入根尖周组织。

目的

本体外研究的目的是评估和比较采用改良热垂直加压技术及不同材料充填根管后的根尖渗漏情况。

方法

按照冠向下/逐步后退技术对65颗拔除的单根牙进行预备。预备过程中及预备后用3%次氯酸钠冲洗每个根管。将牙齿分为3组。每组均采用相同技术进行充填,但使用不同材料:RealSeal系统(SybronEndo公司)、牙胶尖与AH Plus糊剂(登士柏迈丽菲公司)以及牙胶尖与Acroseal封闭剂(Septodont公司)。其余20颗牙齿作为对照组。将牙齿浸泡在1%亚甲蓝中72小时。此后,将牙根纵向劈开,用体视显微镜测量染料渗透情况。

结果

所有组均出现染料渗透。RealSeal组的染料渗透最少(0.33±0.29毫米),而Acroseal组的染料渗透最多(1.11±0.52毫米)。根据学生t检验,Acroseal组的渗漏明显多于RealSeal组和AH Plus材料组(p<0.001)。RealSeal系统的微渗漏与牙胶尖加AH Plus封闭剂的微渗漏无显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

结果表明,新型材料Resilon(RealSeal)和传统的牙胶尖与AH Plus组合的根尖染料渗透最少,封闭效果最佳。

相似文献

1
[Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of different obturation materials].[不同充填材料封闭能力的比较评估]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2010 May-Jun;138(5-6):287-91. doi: 10.2298/sarh1006287m.
2
Comparison of Apical Sealing Capacity of ActiV GP/Glass Ionomer Sealer Versus Resilon/RealSeal and Gutta Percha/AH plus Sealers.ActiV GP/玻璃离子封闭剂与Resilon/RealSeal及牙胶尖/AH plus封闭剂根尖封闭能力的比较
Cureus. 2023 Dec 4;15(12):e49931. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49931. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
An in vitro comparison between the apical sealing abilities of resilon with Epiphany sealer and gutta-percha with AH plus sealer.Resilon与Epiphany封闭剂以及牙胶尖与AH plus封闭剂根尖封闭能力的体外比较。
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Sep-Oct;23(5):694. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.107415.
4
[Assessment of the sealing ability of some root canal sealers applied using lateral condensation and single point techniques].[使用侧向加压和单点技术应用的一些根管封闭剂的封闭能力评估]
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2010;56(1):81-6.
5
Effect of Different Irrigation Solutions on the Apical Sealing Ability of Different Single-cone Obturation Systems: An Study.不同冲洗液对不同单尖充填系统根尖封闭能力的影响:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Feb 1;20(2):158-165.
6
Coronal sealing ability of a new root canal filling material.一种新型根管充填材料的冠部封闭能力。
J Can Dent Assoc. 2007 Sep;73(7):623.
7
An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Apical Leakage Using Different Root Canal Sealers.使用不同根管封闭剂对根尖微渗漏的体外比较评估
Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2020 Nov 25;26:e928175. doi: 10.12659/MSMBR.928175.
8
Evaluation Of Micro Leakage Of Root Canals Filled With Different Obturation Techniques: An In Vitro Study.不同充填技术根管充填微渗漏的评估:一项体外研究
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018 Jan-Mar;30(1):35-39.
9
The long-term sealing ability of AH 26 and AH plus used with three gutta-percha obturation techniques.AH 26和AH plus与三种牙胶尖充填技术联合使用时的长期封闭能力。
Quintessence Int. 2004 Apr;35(4):326-31.
10
Active versus passive microleakage of Resilon/Epiphany and gutta-percha/AH Plus.Resilon/Epiphany与牙胶尖/AH Plus的主动与被动微渗漏
Aust Endod J. 2011 Dec;37(3):141-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2010.00238.x. Epub 2010 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative in Vitro Study of Apical Microleakage with Five Obturation Techniques: Lateral Condensation, Soft-Core®, Obtura II®, Guttaflow® and Resilon®.五种根管充填技术根尖微渗漏的体外比较研究:侧方加压充填法、Soft-Core®、Obtura II®、Guttaflow®和Resilon®
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2014 Jun;48(2):123-31.